I HAVE been an SNP member for more than a decade and with the prospect of another independence referendum on the horizon it is imperative we get the next year right.
There has been a lot of discussion about train strikes over the last week but do you know criminal defence solicitors have been taking “industrial action” for more than nine months in Scotland? We are rightly seeing our SNP elected members up in arms about the UK Government’s Bill of Rights, which fundamentally reduces and takes away our human rights.
This is something we should all be taking incredibly seriously. As Professor Leslie Thomas QC said, it is totalitarianism in broad daylight.
Our human rights are essential to protecting standards of living in a modern functioning democracy and will be ever more important as the cost of living crisis plunges even more people into poverty. However, in order to ensure that our human rights are upheld, it is imperative that anyone who needs access to a lawyer has it.
READ MORE: Lorna Slater says Scots can reject another decade of Boris Johnson
Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) states that to uphold the right to a fair trial, there must be adequate time and facilities to prepare a person’s defence. This is just no longer possible in Scotland after years of cuts and refusal to invest in the pillars of justice.
There has been a great deal of talk recently about the imminent collapse of criminal defence in Scotland. Lyndsey Barber took the decision to leave the profession and documented why in a video on YouTube. I want to say this was an extraordinary move but it wasn’t. People are leaving left, right and centre for all the reasons Lyndsey stated.
It is important we speak about this situation honestly. This is entirely the responsibility of the Scottish Government – it is a devolved issue. We have a minister and junior minister with a portfolio directly responsible for the justice system in Scotland and they are failing woefully.
The Scottish Government has year on year on year cut the legal aid budget – which ensures that those who cannot afford it will still get access to justice – therefore further widening inequality.
The pandemic savaged the courts and judicial system, and as we begin to emerge from the pandemic, there is a need for investment and reparatory work. Instead Keith Brown is sticking his head in the sand – he is nowhere to be seen.
Senior reporters from STV are receiving no reply to requests for interview, with not even a hint of a statement to appease the criticism. Those he represents are crying out for re-assurance and he hasn’t even acknowledged the problem.
Brown is tweeting and talking about the UK’s Bill of Rights and the Nationality and Borders Act but he isn’t talking about the doubling of the number of people currently held in custody on remand awaiting trial compared to pre-pandemic figures, damningly now considered to be the longest periods in Europe. He isn’t talking about protecting justice for those that need it in Scotland.
Firms across the country are making a decision to stop taking on complex cases on legal aid because they no longer have the resources available to them to prepare a proper defence. This cannot be underestimated. It means people in Scotland in 2022 have no recourse to justice, have no route to representation.
While we are having national conversations about better support for those with addiction and mental health problems, when these same people enter the judicial system they are forgotten. They are subjected to cycles of criminalisation without proper representation or defence.
The Scottish Government has led the way with new legislation to protect victims of domestic abuse and sexual violence and has expanded definitions to reflect coercive control, acknowledging that the reality of abuse is not just physical. However, without proper funding in place for defence, there’s no trial. With defence lawyers in short supply, trials are being postponed with no justice for anyone and a continued cycle of re-traumatising those involved at the expense of the public purse.
The economics of this doesn’t work or make sense. Holding people in custody awaiting trial for longer than necessary is a threat to their human rights but it’s also really expensive, as is repeatedly calling cases only for them to be knocked on due to lack of resources. It costs money and further wastes a clogged-up court’s time.
We currently need a justice secretary to be present, engaging and ready to solve the challenges that the judicial system in Scotland faces. The solutions are there but the justice sector needs a minister who will come to the table and acknowledge the grave situation we are in. It’s time for Keith Brown to decide whether he’s ready to come to the table or stand aside and let someone else step in.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel