BORIS Johnson was left with no option but to resign – but in truth, this should have happened a long time ago.
The fact that the Tory party was only moved to act when it became clear he had misled some of his closest colleagues lays bare all that is wrong with Westminster.
Boris Johnson as Prime Minister was only the latest manifestation of a dysfunctional, broken, and corrupt Westminster system that long ago stopped working for Scotland.
No party with the interests of the public at heart would have elected someone with his track record to a position of leadership.
READ MORE: Here's who's confirmed to stand in - and ruled out of - the Tory leadership race
And he certainly should not have been enabled to continue in Downing Street for as long as he did.
The chaos and complete lack of integrity that has characterised his time in office have, in the last few days, descended into complete and utter farce.
And all at a time when people in every part of the UK are struggling with very real challenges.
While there will be a huge and very widespread sense of relief that Boris Johnson’s time as Prime Minister is coming to an end, it is just unsustainable to say he will carry on as caretaker PM.
For as long as he remains in Number 10, he will want to do things – and, in the process of that, would undoubtedly cause even more chaos than he has already.
On a personal level, I wish Boris Johnson and his family well, but the fact is he should never have been in Downing Street.
I look forward to working with his successor, whoever that may be, to tackle the urgent and pressing issues facing all of us – especially the crippling cost of living crisis that is impacting so many people across the UK.
But whoever becomes PM should also know that Scotland expects them to respect democracy and acknowledge the cast-iron democratic mandate for a choice on the country’s future.
And regardless of who now occupies Number 10, it is becoming clearer by the day that Scotland needs more than a change of Prime Minister or a temporary reprieve from the chaos, incompetence and democratic deficit of Westminster – we need the permanent alternative of independence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel