IF, like me, you are not impressed by the hogwash being pushed by promoters of freeports, “green” or otherwise, then you ain’t seen nothing yet.
The latest wheeze from neo-liberal think tanks and other corporate interest groups is to establish charter cities. These represent a huge threat to our whole way of life and to our democracy.
What are charter cities? They are privately owned and operated cities where everything from health care, education and the police force to the legislature and the judicial system are not controlled by the state but by a private corporation accountable only to itself. The corporation sets the rules and enforces them with its privately owned judicial system.
“Don’t be daft. It couldn’t happen here,” you will say, but think again. As you would expect, the idea comes from the USA where it is being pushed by the Heritage Foundation, Charles Koch and hedge-fund guru Robert Mercer, all billionaires or pressure groups for billionaires.
Enthusiastic support in the UK comes from the usual suspects, the free market think tanks like the Institute for Economic Affairs (IEA), the Adam Smith Institute and the Taxpayers’ Alliance (TA).
The IEA had 14 members of Johnson’s first Cabinet while Matthew Elliott of the TA was the CEO of the Leave campaign. Remember the drive to leave the EU was to get away from the regulations it insisted upon to protect citizens and from international law. Sunak is a keen disciple and was spearheading the charter cities plan for the UK.
As with freeports, proponents claim charter cities will create huge economic growth (is that really what a world threatened by climate change needs?) and reduce poverty but there is little evidence to support this claim. On the contrary, there is plenty of evidence about the exploitation and corruption that actually follows. For example, we know already that freeports will lead to an erosion of workers’ rights and environmental protections.
In Honduras, billionaire money helped to set up a corporation city called Prospera. Then the neighbouring town of Crawfish Rock had its water supply connected to Prospera’s.
A dispute followed and the residents of Crawfish were threatened with having their water supply cut off and they were further enraged at the lack of transparency over plans for future acquisition of land. The outcry which followed led to a new Honduran government being elected – a government which repealed the legislation which had permitted Prospera in the first place.
We know already that the austerity policies pursued by the Tories for most of the last 12 years were inspired by a desire to shrink the state but also to run down the services we expect the state to provide so that we are more amenable to the notion that privatisation will somehow make things better.
These policies are demanded by the mega rich, who through their party donations now effectively have control as even Conservative journalist Peter Oborne has noted. Charter cities would simply accelerate that process further.
Charter cities are essentially a ploy to enrich the rich even further and increase inequality for the rest of us. American billionaire Peter Thiel, a key financier of the Trump campaign, sees them as a route to replacing the US Government with corporate power.
It is ironic that the libertarians and free marketeers who are the loudest supporters of deregulation should want to replace what we have with a system which would control our lives ever more tightly.
Andrew M Fraser
Inverness
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel