A TALKTV host has paid homage through gritted teeth to Scotland’s water system as hosepipe bans spring up across England.
Mike Graham and journalist Ross Clark were discussing the state of England’s water supply on TalkTV while comparing their situation with the one in Scotland.
One might be apprehensive listening to Graham talk about Scotland after he said Nicola Sturgeon would enact a lockdown where only people who would vote for independence would be allowed out.
But now, despite his withering approach to Scotland, he is looking north for an example of how to properly implement an essential public service.
Currently, a number of local English water suppliers have had to implement hosepipe bans, prompting some commentators to call for a rethink of how water is distributed south of the Border.
And Graham, compelled to compliment Scotland’s “efficient” and “cheaper” system, couldn’t miss an opportunity to throw a barb our way.
Just now: English media talking to English media, the insidious hatred of Scotland at the same time acknowledging it's a better system#ScottishIndependence2023 pic.twitter.com/mg2S12oiTF
— Rivenrobe 🏴 🇪🇺 (@rivenrobe) August 9, 2022
He said: “They don’t get many things right up in Scotland, but in Scotland the system seems a lot better. It’s a properly nationalised system, you pay for your water through your council tax …
“It’s a lot more efficient, it’s a lot cheaper and it doesn’t have quite so many problems.”
It seems fitting that following the broad and baseless claim that Scotland, as a country, doesn’t get “many things right”, he gives a detailed and specific example of us executing a well-thought-out scheme.
Behold, cognitive dissonance.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak heads to Darlington, Scotland - here's three places to visit on the trip
But, of course, it would be impossible for English media to say anything positive about Scotland without making it backhanded, lest they lose the thread of narrative they have employed since time immemorial.
Scottish tap water is a much-loved symbol of national pride. Most Scots will tell you they thirst for a glass of council juice after being away, but it’s ridiculous to suggest that is the limit of our success.
Not that they would care either way.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel