WHETHER it has been officially called or not, and with the UK Supreme Court yet to rule on the lawfulness of Holyrood holding an independence referendum without the consent of Downing Street, the second independence referendum campaign is already very much underway.
For the British nationalists who, despite Brexit and an increasingly right-wing populist Conservative party, still can't bring themselves to admit that they are in fact nationalists, it has begun like that last panicked week of the 2014 campaign.
The campaign start is reminiscent of the publication of a poll giving Yes a slender lead spooked a Better Together Campaign and shook it out of its complacent belief that it was going to crush the Yes campaign.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson dismisses claims she's set for pro-Union tour with Arlene Foster
This time around they will not make the same mistake. The Conservatives and their allies know that they could lose, they can see the polls too, and for all the online bravado of the staunch mob, more serious heads know that Better Together 2.0 is in serious trouble as it goes into a new campaign with the polls effectively neck and neck.
And this is with a Conservative party which is overtly hostile, not just to the devolution settlement, but to the very concept of the United Kingdom as a union of four distinct nations. There can be no new Vow, no plausible promise of further devolution or any guarantee that a future Westminster government will not seek to undermine the powers of Holyrood.
So what we see instead are desperate attempts to deflect the blame for the current multiple crises which beset this ailing union that isn't a union from Westminster to the Scottish Government. So, we see Labour MSPs attack the Scottish Government for not nationalising the energy companies, even though this is a power reserved to Westminster.
Following a call from Nicola Sturgeon for the energy companies to be nationalised in order to keep bills in check, Labour's Mercedes Villalba took to Twitter to demand : "What's stopping her?" That would be Westminster and the Scotland Act that are stopping her, Mercedes, restrictions on the freedom of action of the Scottish Parliament that the Labour party fully supports.
Meanwhile, Conservative MSP Sandesh Gulhane repeatedly refused to answer a question put to him on the BBC's Good Morning Scotland about what steps the Westminster government should take in order to help vulnerable households deal with soaring energy bills. Instead, he preferred to use the question as a launchpad for some whataboutery regarding the Scottish Government, and even though energy policy is reserved to Westminster, as are the vast majority of tax raising and borrowing powers, Gulhane continued to insist that Holyrood has all the powers and resources that it needs to tackle the crisis by itself.
Their comments come after the First Minister warned that many families face "devastation and destitution" if the looming rises in the energy price cap are allowed to go ahead. She insisted that the nationalisation of the energy companies must be "on the table" although she acknowledged that the devolved government lacks the power to do so and is dependent on the new Conservative Prime Minister taking action. Truss, the likely victor in the Tory leadership contest, is ideologically opposed to nationalisation, which is ironic considering the number of times she has been publicly owned.
Naturally, there was no recognition from either Gulhane or Villalba that the reason we are in this mess in the first place is because of decisions made by British Governments.
In the referendum campaign ahead, we are going to see a lot more opponents of independence blaming Holyrood for Westminster's sins. Westminster is currently rudderless, Johnson has given up doing his job while his likely successor's sole remedy to the problems that assail us is tax cuts that will largely benefit the better off. But Labour and the Conservatives both reserve their ire for a Scottish Government which, in their view, is not doing enough to clear up a mess that is not of its making and gives a free pass to those who created the mess in the first place.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel