SINCE the market turmoil that followed Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng's mini-budget last week eyes have been turning to the think tanks influencing the UK Government's controversial economic policies.
One, in particular, is the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), which bills itself as "the UK's original free-market think-tank".
A massive moment for @iealondon. They’ve been advocating these policies for years. They incubated Truss and Kwarteng during their early years as MPs. Britain is now their laboratory.
— Tim Montgomerie 🇬🇧 (@montie) September 23, 2022
Following Kwasi Kwarteng's tax-cutting fiscal update, Conservative Home founder Tim Montgomerie tweeted: "A massive moment for [the Institute of Economic Affairs].
"They’ve been advocating these policies for years. They incubated Truss and Kwarteng during their early years as MPs. Britain is now their laboratory."
But what exactly is the IEA and what is its connection to the Prime Minister and her Chancellor?
What is the IEA?
The IEA is a libertarian think tank that promotes free-market ideology, deregulation and low taxes.
The registered charity was founded in 1955 by businessman Antony Fisher in response to the post-war social democratic consensus of the time.
The IEA is supportive of Liz Truss's economic vision, having promoted such neo-liberal policies for years.
Who funds the IEA?
The think tank has come under fire for its alleged lack of transparency over its donors.
The Guardian has reported that the IEA has taken donations from the fossil fuel industry while OpenDemocracy revealed it also took cash from the tobacco industry.
The IEA's website reads: "The Institute is entirely independent of any political party or group, and is entirely funded by voluntary donations from individuals, companies and foundations who want to support its work."
In 2018, Unearthed reported that the IEA offered to broker access to UK ministers for US donors seeking to influence Brexit.
In 2019, the Charity Commission warned the organisation about using its resources to campaign for a hard Brexit. The warning was later withdrawn after the IEA agreed to work with the commission to improve its conduct following “a breach of charity law”.
And in 2021, it lost a two-year court battle with LBC radio host James O'brien who claimed the IEA is a politically motivated lobbying firm funded by "dark money".
O’Brien described the think tank as a “hard-right lobby group for vested interests of big business, fossil fuels, tobacco, junk food”.
The IEA said it was the victim of a smear campaign that is politically motivated. It said any implication taht it is engaged in illegal lobbying on behalf of corporations is false.
Who is IEA director general Mark Littlewood?
Mark Littlewood is the general director of the IEA. He was labelled the 38th most influential person on the British right by broadcaster Iain Dale in 2018.
In the same year, the think tank boss was recorded by The Guardian saying that the IEA is in the "Brexit-influencing game", offering potential US donors access to UK Government ministers and civil servants.
In the same story, Littlewood told the newspaper he had "absolutely no problem with people who have business interests, [the IEA] facilitating those".
What's the IEA's connection to Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng?
After her election as Prime Minister, IEA director general Mark Littlewood told Politico that Liz Truss had spoken at IEA events more than “any other politician over the past 12 years”.
The site reported that Littlewood sees Truss as someone who is "genuinely engaged in the ideas rather than just occasionally turning up to say a few warm words at a Christmas party".
He said Truss sees the “big picture positions on tax and regulation and monetary policy” with the IEA.
Truss also hired former IEA member Ruth Porter as her election campaign's co-director.
And in 2012, Kwarteng co-wrote a paper for the Insitute for Economic Affairs on the fiscal rules it argued are needed to control government spending.
The Chancellor was mocked following his mini-budget after a quote from the paper was shared on social media.
It said: “Governments often run a structural deficit to boost the economy with greater spending and lower tax. Unfortunately, this…has a poor track record.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel