SCOTLAND in the UK today is a far cry from the one in 2014. Eight years on, and we are governed at Westminster by what some have described as one of the most right-wing governments in the world.
The UK is a sinking ship trying to pull Scotland down as it goes. This is certainly something Scotland did not vote for, nor has it voted for a Conservative government in the last 60 years. The case for being an independent country has never been clearer or stronger.
We are well-armed with examples of not just what we could be now without the ties to Westminster but also what we could have been. At a time when our younger generations are discussing alternative realities in their daily discourse (a topic especially popular on Reddit and TikTok), we certainly can wonder what could have been our alternative reality if we had taken the Yes path.
We are abundant in evidence and examples of “what we could have won”, but how do we use this? How do we communicate this and get our message across to those who are still to be convinced?
READ MORE: Liz Truss: Independence referendum shouldn't happen even if Supreme Court deems it legal
What is our message? We have so many perspectives on what the message is and should be – we even have “Conservatives for Yes”, believe it or not. The ultimate message surely must be the argument for true democracy. The Yes movement, to use an old term, is a broad church, and we obviously make up many differing views on our vision for the future we have in mind.
My vision for an independent Scotland, I’m sure, differs greatly from that of some reading this piece right now, but ultimately, don’t we all want that debate to be between us and us alone? It should be ours to have without interference, wholly in our Parliament and voted on fairly by Scottish citizens, using all the powers and levers at our disposal.
To end UK rule, to have full autonomy and self-determination realised is not the end goal – it’s the beginning of so much more. Shaping and creating a country of our own free will and choice is what we aspire to – it’s a lifetime’s work and desire of many.
Self-determination has free choice at its core – it is central to democracy. The choice to believe in what we want, to choose to live our lives how we wish, to participate in society in our own way. We may not be free from consequences, good or bad, but freedom to choose should surely always preface that.
How do we then sell choice, full autonomy and self-rule to those who are undecided or who are looking to switch from No to Yes with the right argument to satisfy their apprehension? And why are some still unconvinced by our endeavours? There may be many reasons, but one that stands out to me is our message delivery, which is a crucial aspect of any campaign.
Self-reflection is invaluable to understanding why some will not accept our message, and scrutinising the delivery of it is key to that understanding. We already know that we are viewed by our opposition as unruly and uncouth – or at least that perception is a narrative they push to delegitimise anything we say or do.
We need only look at what surprise there was to how people in Scotland handled the passing of the Queen, that sombre, dignified approach which took them aback. I cannot imagine for the life of me what they expected.
At every turn, there is an effort to delegitimise us and our movement, and our behaviour will ultimately be a deciding factor in how we are portrayed and if our arguments will be given legitimacy by those we seek to convince. They want people to think we are incapable and too reactive to be trusted.
Good relationships build trust and ensure genuine connections with people. It is these genuine connections which will open the hearts and minds of others to the message we are conveying. If we look at conduct around us, we need only ask ourselves if a particular behaviour of an individual or group has ever caused us to disengage from their message. Then ask what we can do to ensure we are conducting ourselves in a manner that doesn’t make people disengage from us.
We can no longer preach to the converted and imagine that it will have an impact on anyone undecided or seek to abuse and vilify each other online, thinking that it in any way, shape or form will convince anyone of the merits of an independent Scotland.
There is plenty to be angry about that I am sure nobody can deny. But when we show self-control in our actions and our words are respectful, we become a place of refuge in an ever more verbally violent debating bubble. We can’t control another person’s actions or words – and of course, why should we? It is their choice, but we can control how we act and respond to them.
Our conduct while campaigning can determine the ultimate outcome. Therefore, I am delighted to see the Code of Conduct on the final agenda for the SNP conference. Our conduct will make or break our campaign – that I am sure of. Committing ourselves to being composed and considerate will not only strengthen us as a movement but it will also protect us from any efforts to delegitimise our message, and it will attract people to join us.
Dignified behaviours are a sign of strength and resolve which our opposition fear – make no mistake, they want to see us chaotic and uncivilised as it plays into their narrative. A civic movement where we engage in good faith, with integrity and respect is a noble aspiration. After all, our cause is a noble one: true democracy.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel