IRRESPECTIVE of what you think about the merits or otherwise of the Gender Recognition Bill, there is a substantial majority in support of it in the chamber and in a parliamentary democracy such as Scotland is supposed to be, the legislation should pass into law. However not for the first time, and no doubt not for the last, the Conservatives are demonstrating that they will only respect democracy when it enables them to get their own way.
Despite the parliamentary majority for the bill, the Conservatives were determined to obstruct its passage by obstructing, filibustering, and employing every underhand tactic at their disposal to make it runs out of time. These are, let us not forget, the very same people who constantly lecture the Scottish Government about “getting on with the day job”, but as strikes spread across the public sector and households struggle with soaring bills, the Tories are determined to take up as much time as possible and prevent the Scottish Government from addressing these vital issues.
READ MORE: Gender recognition reform PASSES in Holyrood after three-day debate
The Conservatives introduced a slew of spurious and trivial amendments, each of which they insisted be debated in full and put to a vote, and repeatedly raised points of order in order to draw out proceedings as long as possible. A bill that should have passed in an hour or two was still being debated after two long drawn-out days with MSPs sitting late into the night.
MSPs from other parties angrily accused the Conservatives of “sh*thousery” and insisted that Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross and his party were making a mockery of the Scottish Parliament. Others claimed that the Presiding Officer and her deputies were furious with Ross and the Conservatives.
Of course, we have seen the Conservatives trash democracy before with their refusal to accept that they campaigned in the 2021 Scottish Parliament elections on the basis of preventing the parliament from having a majority in favour of another independence referendum. The Conservatives lost that election but have spent every day since denying that the current Scottish Government has a mandate for another independence referendum, citing no end of spurious reasons which justify, at least to their own satisfaction, why they feel entitled to run roughshod over the outcome of the most recent Holyrood elections.
The real issue here is not the Gender Recognition Bill, which the Conservatives are merely cynically using as a wedge issue to undermine the Scottish Government. A party that has promoted and defended the disgraceful “rape clause” has no real interest in defending women's rights, no matter what Douglas Ross and his colleagues claim this week. The real issue here is how the Conservatives are likely to behave with any measures brought before Holyrood to promote Scottish independence, another independence referendum, or forcing an early Holyrood election in order to use it as a de facto independence referendum.
Under those circumstances, the Conservatives would behave as they have been behaving this week, but on steroids. Unlike the Gender Recognition Bill, which is supported by most Labour MSPs and by the Lib Dems, the Tories would be able to count on the support and co-operation of the other anti-independence parties in their filibustering and obstructionist tactics. They would use every underhand tactic at their disposal to prevent Holyrood dissolving itself, even if there was no longer any functioning Scottish Government.
Rather, the Tories would welcome the opportunity for the imposition of direct rule from Westminster and would no doubt boycott any Holyrood election being used as a de facto independence referendum in order to strip it of legitimacy. They would then prevail upon their cronies in Westminster not to recognise the new parliament on the basis that it was elected to do something that the UK Supreme Court had ruled was outwith Holyrood's legal competence.
They would do all this with far more energy and enthusiasm than they have displayed in their blocking tactics this week because unlike women's rights, which the Tories are claiming to act to defend out of cynical convenience, they have an actual conviction in British nationalism and opposition to independence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel