SCOTLAND is an ancient European country and existed as such while much of the world was still to be explored and the map of the world was incomplete. Scots have always travelled for trade and adventure, and we went further as the world was unveiled and new societies encountered.
As a nation, as Scots, we have a rich and diverse history of engagement globally. Much of this we can be proud of – it has been positive, leading to a deep and lasting bond of kinship and a thriving and passionate diaspora. Some of it though was dark and exploitative, our involvement in the expansion of the British Empire and the conduct of notable Scots is often, to be charitable, less than glorious, as is, for example, our connections to and collusion with the slave trade.
That darker history must serve as a lesson for how we build our future, and we must always strive to understand and be frank about our failings in history as much as celebrating our many achievements, which have, disproportionately for a nation of our size, benefitted humankind. Indeed, in the case of slavery, the lessons in humanity were already being learnt by the time of the Scottish enlightenment, when a more progressive nation was developing due to the brilliance and advanced philosophy of some of the most famous minds in history.
READ MORE: Strikes: 'Immoral' new legislation condemned by SNP and union bosses
The Scottish History Association points out the numerous strands of thought put forward, at the time, for the abolition of slavery. Notably, it points to what it calls the first modern, mass political movement in Scottish or British history. The mobilisation of large numbers of people in a single-issue campaign involving petitions, sugar boycotts and campaign literature. Particularly successful was the famous image of a kneeling slave and the motto "Am I not a man and a brother?"
Views may vary on the influence of this campaign on the eventual abolition of slavery, but the popularity of this new, outspoken, and progressive action in Scotland is hard to ignore.
Contemporary figures pushed this progressive message further, not uniquely, but probably most famously and internationally through our poet Robert Burns. To this day a popular and much-admired global figure. Among his many works were the echoes of the anti-slavery campaigners, in saying that "a man's a man for a’ that."
This worldview is a precious legacy that Scots and Scotland still hold, with very few identifiable exceptions. Our international "soft power" is generally agreed to be in good credit worldwide. I discovered this first-hand while serving as Vice President of the Conference of Peripheral and Maritime Regions, an organisation representing local authorities across the EU and beyond. Everywhere I went, representatives from all nations wanted to engage and to know more about Scotland.
READ MORE: Will scrapping EU laws mean end for paid holiday in UK?
In the UK, Foreign Affairs are reserved to the UK Government, but the Scottish Government carries the responsibility of maintaining Scotland's presence for trade, education, innovation, culture, and other vital aspects in many cities around the world. This is vital as otherwise, Scotland's unique identity and the inward investment and other opportunities this engagement provides might be lost in the wider interests of Westminster-led policy. This is more crucial than ever in post-Brexit Scotland.
That outward-looking and progressive diplomacy is the bedrock of our ambitions to be a good global citizen. Constructive engagement never goes to waste, although neither does doing the right thing, such as giving full support to Ukraine over the horrendous, illegal war waged on them by Vladimir Putin's forces. It is also essential to speak the truth to friends and allies. This must be done, even though famously in the case of Donald Trump's America the UK Government failed to do so and, instead, tolerated and even pandered to him.
There are current and dangerous failures by the UK Government over, for example, British Council workers under threat in Afghanistan and over Chinese state interference - similar to the unchecked transgressions carried out by Putin prior to the Ukraine invasion.
That said, there will be much to agree on in foreign policy terms while maintaining the need to hold UK ministers to account.
READ MORE: Scottish Parliament's first debate in 2023 to be on independence
There are growing tensions over China's threats to Taiwan. As mentioned, support for Ukraine needs to be maintained. There are ongoing issues in Iran and human rights abuses in other parts of the world. Diplomacy is a tricky business, for sure, but the work will be to progress Scotland's desire to be a positive global citizen, to work for the good agency for all the nations of the UK and, since Scotland aspires to re-join the EU, a close alignment to EU diplomacy.
All of this will be at the forefront of my mind in my role as the SNP’s Spokesperson for Foreign Affairs at Westminster. As possibly the only non-ministerial, card-carrying diplomat in the Parliament (I'm an honorary consul for the Highlands and Islands to Romania and was honoured with the rank of 'Cavalier’, or knight, in 2016), I am experienced in engagement with neighbours near and far.
With that in mind, I look forward to making a positive case for Scotland, both now, under our current arrangement, and in the near future, as a normal independent country, aiming to be the best global citizen we can be.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel