I’M transported back in time to Castlemilk with the news that the Scottish Parliament has passed the Hunting With Dogs (Scotland) Bill.
The edgy but charismatic housing estate on the far south side of Glasgow featured unwittingly the first time fox-hunting was debated at Holyrood, some 24 years ago.
On that occasion, the legislation which sought to ban it didn’t quite work, leaving too many loopholes which politicians feel have since been exploited.
The two-decade fight to leave our foxes alone began early in the life of the Scottish Parliament. That was when the former Labour MSP Mike Watson won the ballot to introduce Holyrood’s first-ever Private Members’ Bill. This led to a degree of bemusement among the citizens of Castlemilk, many of whom had voted for Watson who thus duly became MSP for Glasgow Cathcart.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn to speak at major Glasgow rally against UK anti-strike bill
Now, as those of you who know and love Castlemilk will attest, the neighbourhoods which form this sprawling estate are surrounded by many arboreal features. And doubtless, very many furry beasties reside in them. Yet, until then, no one had yet seen any evidence of men and women dressed as 18th-century toy soldiers chasing foxes through the fields with galloping steeds.
I feel sure that Castlemilk bows to
no-one in its affection for foxes, but I think its voters were hopeful that among the main priorities of their new MSP would have been seeking to address the acute social inequality that disfigured their community.
Now, 24 years after Watson introduced his Protection of Wild Mammals Bill, there may be a similar measure of bemusement among some communities as our MSPs congratulated themselves for banning Hunting With Dogs (apart from the fact that it won’t actually ban it outright).
AS the first diet of the Scottish Parliament began to grapple with the issues confronting the newly devolved Scotland, civil servants struggled to cope with the raft of new legislation
and the updating of existing ones. Naturally, there was some early confusion around what was devolved and what wasn’t.
This also affected some journalists, including me. When I was executive editor of HM Daily Mail in Scotland, we were invited to take tea with the formidable, but gentle, Annabel Goldie, then leader of the Scottish Tories.
Ms Goldie was held in genuine affection on all sides of Holyrood and spoke with the sort of accent that made the Queen seem like a schemie.
Occasionally, in my four-year sojourn at the Daily Mail, I reverted to political type and quite forgot my surroundings. Thus, when I began talking about the need for Holyrood to express its opposition to yet another UK military adventure, she turned to me and, in a voice channelling Miss Jean Brodie in her prime, chided me elegantly: “But Mr McKenna, thet my dear boy, is a reserrrrved metter.”
She also favoured us with an elaborate arching of her eyebrow as she considered another piece of early Holyrood legislation, concerning the banning of mink farms in Scotland: “As fer as I know, there err no mink farms in Scotland.”
TO East Ayrshire to drink in the aftermath of Darvel FC’s astounding Scottish Cup victory over mighty Aberdeen.
Sitting just behind the goal is a memorial wall, whose bricks are inscribed with the names of supporters and their families, past and present. Some of Scotland’s larger clubs,
such as Celtic and Rangers, also have walls like these. But Darvel’s is the
only one I’ve encountered which faces the pitch and witnesses the deeds of today’s heroes.
One of the names on the wall is one Sir Alex Ferguson, who although he never had any playing connection to this part of Scotland, had forged a lasting friendship with an old Darvel supporter, known as Postie, whose name sits alongside him.
READ MORE: First-ever summit to bring Welsh independence movement together
Quite what Sir Alex made of his beloved Aberdeen – who defeated Real Madrid in a European final 40 years ago – losing to Darvel Juniors is anyone’s guess. He certainly won’t have appreciated the joyful Darvel supporters singing “You’re getting sacked in the morning” to Aberdeen’s hapless manager, Jim Goodwin. Or the Aberdeen travelling support joining in.
ABERDEEN’s victory against Real Madrid in 1983 will doubtless feature in forthcoming editions of the pages of this newspaper and its sister title The Herald this year as the latter paper celebrates its 240th year in business.
That Aberdeen side was one of the finest ever assembled in Scotland, and all of them, like Celtic’s great Lisbon Lions, were born and raised on these shores.
The Press & Journal, our esteemed newspaper sibling in the north-east, has laid claim to being 275 years old and we congratulate them for reaching such a landmark this year. The P&J is a great wee paper which serves its locale brilliantly and with some style.
The Herald, though, is the oldest, continuously published daily NATIONAL newspaper in the world. Just thought I’d clear that up.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here