AS each day goes by, support for Scottish independence continues to grow. This week alone, your benefits of being part of the Union include interest rates reaching a 15-year high, record profits for Shell while the Tories charge on with raising the energy bill price cap in April – and, to top it off, the UK is tipped to be the only major economy expected to shrink in 2023.
A complete shambles is what it is. They keep telling us we are better together, but they can’t honestly tell us why.
The Tories and Labour can bury their heads in the sand all they want on the question of Scottish independence, but it is not going away. The reality is that these pro-Brexit and anti-Scottish democracy parties do not represent the people of Scotland.
We in Scotland have a majority of pro-independence members of the UK Parliament and we have a pro-independence government in our Scottish Parliament that ran on manifesto commitments to hold a referendum. That should be enough for any UK Government to acknowledge democracy.
Back in December, my colleague Philippa Whitford asked Rishi Sunak at PMQs: “Can the Prime Minister clarify if he still believes the UK is a voluntary Union and if so can he explain the democratic route by which the people of Scotland can choose whether to stay or not?”
I wrote to the Prime Minister following his failure to answer Philippa’s question, instead highlighting the Supreme Court’s judgment.
Of course, the Supreme Court decision only confirmed that the power to grant a referendum on Scottish independence rests with the UK Government and the Prime Minister – it did not grant a view on independence itself.
READ MORE: Nadine Dorries snarks at Nicola Sturgeon during bizarre TV show debut
Fast-forward to this week and I have now received a response to my letter – almost two months later – not from the Prime Minister, but from his faithful Secretary of State for Scotland, Alister Jack.
In my time as the SNP spokesperson for Scotland, I spent years trying to find out what Alister Jack and his department actually do for the benefit of Scotland. Turns out, he spends his time answering the PM’s letters.
Jack’s letter is filled with the usual Tory jargon about pulling our resources together and working constructively as an equal partner in the United Kingdom. The problem with that is that we are not an equal partner in the United Kingdom, in fact far from it.
On the back of the Supreme Court decision, it is on Rishi Sunak or whoever replaces him to work constructively with our democratically elected First Minister in delivering what the people of Scotland continue to vote for. And make no mistake, that is for us to have the right to choose our own future.
An extract from Alister Jack’s response reads: “It is obvious that the people of Scotland can have their say in an independence referendum because that is precisely what happened in 2014 when they voted decisively to remain part of the UK.
“In 2014, both the UK Government and the Scottish Government agreed that it was the right thing for the people of Scotland to have their say in an independence referendum, and there was also consensus from Scottish political parties, civic society and people across Scotland. That is not the case at this time.”
So let’s break that down. The UK Government is saying that if Scottish political parties, civic society and people across Scotland want an independence referendum then there shall be one.
Well, for a start, people across Scotland do want a referendum as they have continually proven at the polls for nearly a decade now.
The Secretary of State mentions civic society. I have pressed him on this previously and how his department would measure the consensus of Scottish civic society on the question of independence – and he had no answer.
We have already established that both the Scottish Tories and Scottish Labour not only deny Scottish democracy but are proud of it.
It is not for the people of Scotland to decide our future then, it is for them to decide. Are we to be at the mercy of the UK’s political party branch offices for eternity when it comes to Scotland’s democratic rights?
What truly is the answer from the UK Government to the question of how we as a country are granted an independence referendum?
Much like everything else, they do not have an answer.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel