THE BBC has published a full, unedited interview with Tory Party deputy chair Lee Anderson after the MP claimed he could not trust the broadcaster to “be fair to me”.
At the end of the 11-minute interview – pre-recorded with the MP on Wednesday and broadcast on Thursday – Anderson attacks the BBC, threatening never to talk to them again if they broadcast parts of the interview and not its full length.
After being told that the interview would be too long to broadcast in full, Anderson said: “I’m asking you not to put it on then.”
READ MORE: Lee Anderson scolded for 'bad taste' tweet about staff member
He went on: “I’m asking you now not to play it. I can’t trust you to play the whole lot and be fair to me.
“We’re supposed to be talking about my role as a chairman. Listen, listen! We’re supposed to be talking about my role as deputy chairman, not the other stuff.
“You went off on a tangent … So don’t play it please. If you do, I will never give you anything again.”
Interview below: Dishonesty raised around 7mins 30, Anderson challenges BBC around 9mins 40
The outburst came after Anderson, who was elevated to deputy chair of the Conservative Party by Rishi Sunak on Tuesday, flatly refused to answer questions about his dishonesty put to him by BBC Radio Nottingham.
BBC host Verity Cowley pressed the deputy chair on a video from the 2019 General Election campaign which showed him asking a friend to lie to journalists and pretend to be a swing voter angry at Labour.
I made Lee Anderson Deputy Chairman because he represents the integrity and professionalism that I value so much. Like that time he lied to a journalist and got his mate to pretend he didn't know him.
— Parody Rishi Sunak (@Parody_PM) February 7, 2023
Please don’t share. #Reshufflepic.twitter.com/FJo0YuWPg7
Anderson, the MP for Ashfield, did not answer but instead asked 10 times if the BBC journalist had “ever told a lie”.
After the lengthy back and forth where Anderson insisted the host had to say if she had ever told a lie in order to have a “balanced conversation”, he insisted that voters did not care about the incriminating video because they had elected him anyway.
Anderson’s election was a part of the fall of Labour’s “red wall” across northern England. It was the first time since a 1977 by-election that a Tory had won the seat.
The clash over dishonesty came after Anderson – known as “30p Lee” for his insistence that people can cook meals from scratch for that cost – was challenged over his views on food banks by the BBC host.
Told of reports that nurses and firefighters, some earning £30-£35,000 a year, have been forced to use food banks, Anderson made clear he did not believe it.
"Even though nurses, firefighters, people who've got jobs are saying 'I need to use this' you don't believe them?" Anderson was asked. He replied: “No.”
He challenged the BBC to find any nurse or firefighter in Ashfield who has to use a foodbank, insisting that the “facts” were that no one earning more than £30,000 would need to use such a service.
READ MORE: MP who said food bank users ‘cannot budget’ appointed deputy Tory chairman
Cowley then asked if people should just believe Anderson given that he “might be a bit dishonest”.
The BBC published the full interview, as well as broadcasting it.
It comes after Anderson stoked further controversy by saying he supported the return of the death penalty. He told the Spectator: “Nobody has ever committed a crime after being executed.
“You know that, don’t you? 100% success rate.”
The death penalty for murder in the UK was outlawed permanently in 1969, with it totally abolished for all crimes in 1998.
Prime Minister Sunak rejected Anderson’s calls for the return of the death penalty, saying: “That’s not my view, that’s not the Government’s view. But we are united in the Conservative Party in wanting to be absolutely relentless in bearing down on crime and making sure people are safe and feel safe.”
Speaking on the BBC, Anderson said: "They say I'm controversial but it's the media that stokes controversy by picking up on these sorts of stories.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel