SCOTLAND’S Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) is a major part of our efforts to reduce littering, cut emissions, and address the climate emergency
On track to launch in August, our DRS will reduce littering by a third and CO2 emissions by four million tonnes over 25 years. That’s equivalent to taking 83,000 cars off the road – and it is just the latest in a series of successful examples from around the world.
Countries such as Germany and Denmark, and the regional schemes in Canadian states, have already shown what a huge and positive impact deposit return can have, dramatically reducing litter and cutting climate emissions.
As the first of its kind in the UK, Scotland’s DRS means big change, which is inevitably a challenge.
However, I’m pleased to say that industry has risen to that challenge. As of yesterday, 664 drinks producers, representing more
than 95% of the total volume of drinks containers sold in Scotland each year have completed registration for the scheme.
Circularity Scotland, the organisation responsible for administering Scotland’s DRS, has been working closely with businesses of all sizes to prepare for launch in August this year. They are now at an advanced stage of building the necessary infrastructure and logistics network that will support the scheme.
READ MORE: What are transmission fees and why is Scotland charged so much?
Sites have been secured across the country to handle and process material. Counting equipment and vehicle fleets are arriving. Recruitment is underway to create 500 new jobs in Scotland in processing and logistics. An estimated £300m has now been invested by the private sector in this scheme.
Even so, DRS is a big change for small businesses to manage and that is why Circularity Scotland has announced a £22m package of support that will remove the day-one and month-one charges for all producers, up to a threshold of three million units per year.
I know producers still have concerns and that is why we are exploring all fair, feasible and legal options available to support them, including a potential grace period.
The implications of a step like this, how it would work operationally, fairly, and legally for businesses and communities still need to be worked through.
In the meantime, producers can continue to register even after yesterday’s deadline, and I would encourage any who have not to do so as soon as possible.
Advice and guidance are available from Circularity Scotland and SEPA, which have made clear it will take a proportionate approach to compliance. They will work with businesses to help them get ready – advice and guidance, not fines, will be the first step for any business that is clearly taking action but struggling to meet their obligations.
Regarding the Internal Market Act, there is a process between the UK Government and devolved governments to allow for exemptions, which has already been used successfully to exclude Scotland’s ban on certain single-use plastic items.
Following repeated requests for an exclusion dating back to July 2021, the First Minister has written to the Prime Minister this week, reiterating that the UK Government must exclude the deposit return scheme regulations from the Internal Market Act.
Nonetheless, I can say that Scotland’s deposit return scheme will go live in August with confidence because people have voted with their feet.
Producers have registered, and I am grateful to them for doing so. They have done so because the overwhelming majority recognise their responsibility.
They don’t want broken bottles or plastic litter on our streets, parks and beaches either. And they recognise that this scheme is the way to end that blight.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel