AT this point I am beginning to suspect that Matt Hancock has been created as some sort of subversive art project.
The former Health Secretary has been caught in an undercover sting by campaign group Led by Donkeys, agreeing to work for a fake South Korean firm for a £10k daily rate.
He wasn’t the only one. The former Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng also agreed to act as consultant for the fake firm, saying he “wasn’t looking for a king’s ransom” but wouldn’t work for anything less than 10k per month.
The Chairman of the 1922 committee of Conservative MPs, Sir Graham Brady, told the undercover reporter that a rate of £6k per day “feels about right” while making it clear that he couldn’t advocate on behalf on the interests of the company and the payment would be on MPs declared register of interests.
It is instructive to note how quick these MPs were to believe that there was nothing amiss in being offered such vast sums for their “expertise”.
It gives an insight into both the terrifying levels of self-belief among senior Tory MPs and how normal an approach like this must be from a foreign business to our members of parliament.
The MPs targeted in the sting were sent an email from a fake investment firm, Hanseong Consulting, saying it was looking for individuals for an “international advisory board” to “help our clients navigate the shifting political, regulatory and legislative frameworks” in the UK and across Europe.
The website was rudimentary and MPs clearly didn’t do much digging about the background or history of the fake company before agreeing to the meeting with the undercover reporter, otherwise they would have easily spotted it was a scam.
I’ve done deeper background checks on potential Tinder dates than these idiots do on what foreign businesses they sell themselves to.
There is a clear mismatch between the demonstrable idiocy of MPs being so easily lured into a trap by undercover reporters and those same MPs also believing that access to their pollical nous is worth thousands of pounds per day.
READ MORE: Michael Gove's awkward answer to question about Nicola Sturgeon's biggest achievement
At this point, I should probably give a rundown of the litany of lobbying, cash-for-access and second job scandals of members of parliament in recent years, just so we’re all up to speed on how monumentally stupid the MPs snared by the Led by Donkeys sting are.
But we’d be here all day and this column would end up resembling the Wikipedia page for examples of the phrase “they’re at it”.
Suffice to say, recent evidence has shown that we are being ruled by a party of greedy and self-serving so-and-sos.
MPs earn £84k per year. Even leaving aside the vast wealth that many of them have accrued before entering parliament, that’s a hefty sum, is it not? Am I going mad here?
Why are so many of them flaunting their wares to entice the interest of outside businesses and firms? Why are they selling their souls for more, more, more?
If I earned £84k a year I wouldn’t do one single minute of work to make extra on top. I’d be kicking back on a comfy chair, with the central heating on full blast, eating toast spread with a £6 tub of Lurpak, like a normal person would in such circumstances.
READ MORE: John Curtice: Why a Scottish independence referendum WILL happen
While the Led by Donkeys video might be excruciatingly embarrassing for the MPs involved – and a jaw-dropping watch for members of the public currently struggling with the cost of living crisis – nothing shown in it goes against parliamentary rules.
Our MPs are perfectly entitled to hawk their services to the highest bidder, providing they declare the payments and don’t fall foul of the wishy-washy, loophole-ridden rules around lobbying.
One of the arguments for letting our elected representatives continue to fill their coffers on shady “consultancy” jobs is that banning the practice would make the “best and the brightest” talent think twice before entering public service.
The horror of it.
Imagine a world without Matt Hancock MP, who broke his own Covid rules to dry-hump his mistress in the office.
Or one without Kwasi Kwarteng MP, the man who tanked the economy and was forced to resign after just 38 days in post, making him the shortest-serving chancellor ever, excluding the one who died while in office.
How would our democracy cope without the unrivalled insight and expertise of the Tory lads on the take?
Without the opportunity to amass additional fortunes on top of their MPs salary, we’d end up attracting the kind of people who are perfectly happy to somehow survive on £84k a year.
The kind of people who, when offered £10k per day from a foreign business nobody has ever heard of, think: “hold on a wee minute here, this doesn’t seem quite right”, instead of holding out their sweaty palm and asking when the first board meeting is.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel