MANY SNP members I talk to privately fear their party is about to embark on the same path Labour in Scotland has followed since devolution, electing a series of short lived leaders who fail to halt the decline.
With Nicola Sturgeon’s departure and the collapse in membership figures others worry the best days of the SNP may be behind them. I am not a member of the SNP but I do have an interest in arresting the existing loss of momentum the independence movement as a whole has endured since 2014. Looking back I believe the movement began to lose its way when it largely dissolved into a single party.
The decision by 100,000 Yes supporters to join the SNP after the 2014 referendum left a powerful cause at the mercy of one party’s whims. And, as Oscar Wilde famously put it, the SNP, despite knowing this was likely to be a backward step, "could resist anything but temptation".
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf must be careful over pressure on 'progressive agenda'
Nicola Sturgeon took over as First Minister at the same time and the cult of "Nicolamania" was born. In the world of personality politics she was the queen, no questions asked.
Accountability, collaboration and collective thinking consequently went out the window. That was not a good thing. Those outside the SNP who warned this was a retrograde step were ostracised. Our voices barely tolerated, our warnings unwelcome. Gone was the collegiate atmosphere of Yes. Nicola knew best and nothing could be allowed to cut across the SNP’s electoral prospects, even when it was clearly to the detriment of the wider independence cause.
I warned many times over the past 10 years, including in the pages of this newspaper, "it’s not unity the Independence movement needs most of all, it's clarity". But the warnings were not heeded and that clarification has just not been forthcoming. Unfortunately our movement has stagnated. Support for Independence never secured a majority and now Sturgeon herself "has had enough".
Felled by her failures like relegating Independence to some adjunct of EU membership, a ludicrous sojourn to the UK Supreme Court and the economic incoherence of her Sustainable Growth Commission were each displays of her "mis-leadership".
And her "mediocre" [Kate Forbes’ description] record in government on health, education, justice, public housing and inequality means history will regard her good at winning elections, poor at delivering material changes.
Politics is unforgiving. The new SNP leader therefore faces the same questions Nicola Sturgeon shirked. How are we ever going to secure majority support for independence? Where is the coherent economic case capable of persuading people of its material benefits? And how, given the intransigence of the British State are we to achieve it democratically?
To be fair, I never heard any of the three SNP leadership candidates answer these questions adequately.
The fact remains the SNP cannot achieve independence on its own. No one political party can. They need the help only that wider movement can provide. The new SNP leader must therefore allow other voices to be heard if this is to genuinely become a mature, democratic movement.
It’s more than 10 years since I was invited to join Yes Scotland as a Board member. I represented the Scottish Socialist Party on the Scottish Independence Convention for a decade before that. All of which leads me to suggest it is time for the Independence movement as a whole to come together again and establish a collective, single body with the ultimate responsibility for taking our movement forward and delivering our shared goal.
The new SNP leader must, in my view, see it as a priority to convene a new Scottish Independence Convention with a representative, collective leadership/Board. Among its priorities must be setting out an unambiguous Left of Centre economic case that can secure majority support for a programme designed to redistribute Scotland’s wealth and create much more of it.
It must reinvigorate our movement with an inspiring vision of independence based on delivering profound change, not a mini-me version of the UK state. And it must seek to win over those presently undecided and No voters with a case that is credible, attractive and has democratic self-determination enshrined within it.
And finally, in the face of the intransigence of 600 Westminster MP’s, it must mobilise that majority support via both parliamentary and extra-parliamentary means. All of this, I fully accept, takes time and an enormous amount of effort, enthusiasm and commitment.
READ MORE: What happened in the room as Humza Yousaf became SNP leader
All the more reason for the unified Convention I advocate because that mobilisation can only be achieved by a mass movement clear on its purpose, inspired by its goal, with a determined leadership and a clear strategy for success.
That is why I call on Humza Yousaf today to inaugurate that new Convention this summer. The Scottish Socialist Party stands ready, as I’m sure others are, to play a full and productive part within it.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here