IN 1296, Scotland’s ancient Stone of Destiny was stolen by King Edward I of England, carried in triumph down to London and installed, in an obviously inferior position, beneath the English throne in England’s capital.
Did the “Hammer of the Scots” place it beneath his backside out of respect for its importance to the Scots and acknowledgement of its symbolism and alleged mystical power or as a display of his loathing and contempt for Scotland and her people? I suspect it was the latter.
Once again, the stone is being transported down south to be inserted under the backside of yet another English monarch. Only this time it is with the willing acquiescence of the Scottish Government and, by association, the people of Scotland.
READ MORE: Stone of Destiny leaves Scotland for the first time in over 25 years
Having recovered the stone in 1996, why should we now return it to the descendent of the thief? Whether it’s the real one or a fake substitute is irrelevant, the message is the same: “Know your place, Scotland”.
Isn’t it time we got off our knees and stopped meekly accepting one insult after another? The stone should stay in Scotland where it belongs and the English establishment told to get stuffed.
D Henderson
Bearsden
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel