STEPHEN Flynn is seriously underestimating the solidarity of the Westminster duopoly; there is no chance of a Labour-SNP coalition in Westminster (“Starmer will U-turn on refusal to work with SNP”, May 10).
We have already seen how the members of the Scottish branches of the London-based Unionist parties united immediately after the elections, without any local agreements, on councils all over Scotland to keep the SNP on the sidelines.
Why should the blue, red or orange Tories seek assistance from the SNP, when all three are pursuing the same policies?
READ MORE: Labour mocked for urging Tories to rule out 'desperate' deal with SNP
Far better to leave the SNP holding the so-called balance of power – that would give them the opportunity for an endless blame game that they could never lose.
The SNP would be unable to carry through legislation in Westminster and would face popular proposals from all three London-based parties carefully drafted so that they would not get through Westminster, apparently because they were opposed or not supported by the SNP.
Imagine a Labour proposal to make very large cuts in income tax over the whole of the UK, naturally with the Chancellor setting the tax bands. The Tories would oppose it on the grounds that they are working on an even better system (jam tomorrow and soon forgotten) but as far as opposition parties and the media are concerned it would have been blocked because the SNP voted against lower income tax.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak climbs down on EU law 'bonfire' pledge
The Tory and LibDem parties would also have their share of stage-managed debates in Westminster, probably backed up by opposition motions in Holyrood.
Whatever happens at the next UK General Election, the only certainty is that the SNP will not be part of the UK Government.
Let’s make sure that this is because Scotland has already taken back control and joined the family of nations that endeavour to make them better places for everybody who lives or works there.
John Jamieson
South Queensferry
THE contempt for human rights was on show during the farcical coronation where the Met Police were pre-emptively arresting people in case they made a protest or complaint about the millions of pounds of public money being squandered on one of the richest men in the country. Welcome to new UK, where human rights don’t exist and the police can now arrest and detain you if they think you look like you’re going to object to something!
In contrast a completely happy bunch of 20,000 Scots walked across Glasgow to call for our nation’s independence, with no trouble, no arrests – and after all the speeches were finished the organisers cleared up Glasgow Green, with no litter left behind. This is the Scotland I want to see.
READ MORE: PMQs: Stephen Flynn takes Rishi Sunak to task on coronation arrests
There is no excuse for the actions of the Met Police and the Tory government, who continue to push against basic human rights. We need to escape this increasingly fascist state as soon as possible. I don’t care who wins the next UK General Election, and having the power to shift Keir Starmer to the left doesn’t interest me at all – all I want is for our elected representatives to stop wasting time in Westminster and lead the charge for our independence.
Saturday’s rally clearly showed that the independence movement is alive and well. I am also not willing to wait for political parties to take more time to decide when to act – if the political parties don’t catch up with the indy movement they will fine themselves tossed aside. It’s time for the SNP to focus on the one policy that will improve everything – INDEPENDENCE.
Cllr Kenny MacLaren
Paisley
WITH the independence movement regaining energy recently, there is much being said about starting the hard work of creating a written constitution for an indy Scotland. Everything must be done prepare for day one of independence, and to pre-empt Unionist arguments like “but what currency will you use?”
READ MORE: Ireland plan for sovereign wealth fund is ‘example for Scotland’
However, there is a chicken-and-egg situation here. A written constitution must have input and buy-in from all parts of society, yet Unionists would hardly engage with a process that they don’t want to take effect (similar to an unofficial referendum boycott). If the Yes movement formulate their own document, would this not invite umbrage from those not involved in, or even aware of, the writing process?
Of course, the work must start now: but we must acknowledge that, with the best intentions, we cannot speak for everyone. Surely we should start talking about an “interim” constitution, to bridge the gap from independence day to a fully inclusive and settled constitution written by a People’s Assembly – which would include those who voted No.
Kyle Arnot
Glasgow
ON Wednesday in the House of Commons we heard Glasgow MP Alison Thewliss highlight at PMQs that 13,450 prepayment vouchers have gone unclaimed in her constituency, amounting to £887,000, and that £16.5m in prepayment vouchers have gone unclaimed in Scotland. Prepayment meters are the most expensive form of household heating and are often in homes of the most vulnerable and low-income families, a scandal of epic proportions.
This revelation by Ms Thewliss MP exposes the failure of the government’s system of claiming vouchers, indicating the system is not fit for purpose and is certainly not designed with assisting the most vulnerable in mind. A review is urgently required and must be forthcoming in the interest of future wellbeing, as sitting in the cold is not only uncomfortable for those affected, it has long-term implications for our health services.
Catriona C Clark
Falkirk
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel