LABOUR have refused to support the SNP’s efforts to repeal anti-protest legislation – calling their attempt “a stunt”.
The SNP brought forward a motion to repeal the Public Order Act – which gives police in England sweeping powers to crack down on peaceful protest – but Labour said they would not back it.
In response, the SNP criticised Labour and accused the party of “simply looking like gormless Tory sidekicks”.
MPs debated the motion on Tuesday evening but Labour said they would not “dignify this stunt” with their support.
MPs rejected the effort, voting 278 to 57, majority 221, against the motion aimed at seizing control of parliamentary time in order to scrap the law.
It comes after Keir Starmer said the legislation should be allowed time to settle in.
He also said he would not repeal the government’s Illegal Migration Bill, which among other provisions effectively criminalises seeking asylum in the UK.
His official spokesperson said it would not be “necessary” to do so for Labour to introduce its own immigration policy, if it forms the UK Government after the next election.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer told to follow Nigel Farage and admit Brexit is 'disaster'
Opening the SNP’s opposition day debate in the Commons, SNP home affairs spokeswoman Alison Thewliss said: “The Leader of the Opposition, instead of saying that this Bill should be repealed, has said we need to let it bed in.
"The shadow foreign secretary (David Lammy) has said we can’t come into office picking through all the Conservative legislation and repealing it, it would take up so much parliamentary time.
“Well, I’m giving the opportunity to the official Opposition today, here’s some parliamentary time, here is the opportunity to repeal it. Why will they not come forward and support us in the lobbies tonight?”
She added: “They are not opposing the restrictions on the right to (protest) and their dithering is enabling it. They have said they are a government in waiting, but today, on this Bill, and on so many other Bills, they are simply looking like gormless Tory sidekicks.”
Labour’s shadow policing minister Sarah Jones criticised the SNP for their debate on the bill, calling it nothing more than a political stunt”, adding: “We will not dignify this stunt with our support.”
But she added: “I am weary of a government that has refused to listen, to the [MPs] on their own side, to the [MPs] on this side, to the public and to many current and former police officers.
“Instead, they’ve chosen headlines over common sense, party interest over freedom, strict limitations over liberty.”
She added: “We had warned the Government again and again that their measures were too broad, and it would seem we were right.”
The new powers in the Public Order Act were seen in action during the King’s coronation on May 6 – when peaceful anti-monarchy protesters were arrested.
Graham Smith, CEO of anti-monarchy campaign group Republic, was one of them. He said: "Labour should be ashamed of themselves. The current law is a disgrace."
Joanna Cherry, the SNP MP for Edinburgh South West, said: “I believe that the last 12 months have seen an unprecedented attack on the right to protest.
“Unfortunately, across the UK we are allowing a degree of authoritarianism to creep into our public life and we’ve even seen recently police turning up at members of the public’s doors to check their thinking, and that’s a really serious attack on freedom of expression.”
Claire Haughey, SNP MSP for Rutherglen, said of Labour: "The opposition that refuses to oppose."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel