“SNEAKY and devious” was my thought when I heard that the Conservatives at Holyrood were moving a no-confidence vote in the Scottish Government minister Lorna Slater MSP.
This vote of no confidence was moved on the very day that MPs in Westminster were discussing the privileges committee report on the behaviour of one of Boris Johnson. Prime minister, the office of first citizen of the country, is a position that demands the upholding of democracy. Yet as we all know now, this report divulged the contempt in which this previous PM held parliament.
READ MORE: Lorna Slater survives vote of no confidence at Holyrood
Absent from the chamber during this unprecedented debate was none other than the current Conservative PM Rishi Sunak MP!
But back to the Conservatives at Holyrood – was this nothing other than the Scottish Conservatives trying to take the country’s focus off the goings-on at Westminster? The voters will answer that question at the next election.
Catriona C Clark
Falkirk
GOOD Morning Scotland presenter Gary Robertson attacked the circular economy minister Lorna Slater on Wednesday morning over the cancellation of the Deposit Return Scheme (DRS). He used quotes from the CEO of the Circularity Scotland, who said that the DRS system could have continued without glass being involved in the scheme initially.
Robertson challenged the minister on the basis the comment from the CEO asking why didn’t DRS simply go ahead. Slater advised that it was a torpedoed by UK Government, in this instance Scottish Secretary Alister Jack who also “bragged” about how he could stop the DRS scheme. It appears Jack did so by imposing restrictions on the plan, which Slater advised meant the DRS was undeliverable.
READ MORE: Fergus Ewing 'set to lose party whip' after vote against Lorna Slater
If you were taking out a loan from a company for a car or something big like that with a many-year life, and the loan company presented you with a contract which had the interest rate box blank, you would naturally ask the question “what’s the interest rate?”, wouldn’t you?
My guess is yes, you would, as would I.
The loan company response is “Ah! We’ll tell you later sometime in 2025”. That was the offer that Alister Jack made to “support” the DRS.
I am guessing that’s when you would stand up and thank the loan company representative for their time and shut the door on your way out. Possibly an expletive or two may pass your lips.
Alistair Ballantyne
Angus
QUITE rightly so, SNP MPs lined up to vote for the 90-day suspension of former PM Boris Johnson. To be fair, rather than resigning and running away, Johnson should be facing criminal charges for all the Covid deaths caused by his inaction and for all the billions of pounds stolen from the state during the dodgy Covid contracts.
READ MORE: Labour MSP in law breach fears amid Margaret Ferrier petition
However, in looking at which MPs had voted and comparing this to the vote against Margaret Ferrier MP, something did strike me as strange. Three SNP MPs – Mhairi Black, Alison Thewliss and Stewart M McDonald – all failed to turn up to vote against Boris but found the time to stick the boot into their former colleague Ms Ferrier! What does that say about these SNP MPs, that they can ignore Johnson’s misdemeanours but continue to hound a former colleague who made one mistake – which many others have done and got away with! No wonder SNP supporters and members like myself are trying to work out what happened to the SNP!
Alex Beckett
Paisley
REGARDING the article “Ferrier recall petition opens for signatures” (Jun 20), the circumstances at the time of her actions need to be taken into consideration.
Unlike now, when Margaret Ferrier had symptoms and took a Covid test on September 26 2020, results weren’t available quickly. There were no options at that time to attend the House of Commons online, despite rules restricting numbers meeting together socially.
READ MORE: SNP candidate urges voters to sign petition and remove Margaret Ferrier
It had previously been arranged that she was to speak in the Commons on September 27. Perhaps she let her sense of duty to her constituents take priority and overcome precautions regards Covid risks.
It was only after speaking in the Commons that she found out her Covid test was positive. At that time there were no special facilities like hotels set up where she could self-isolate. MPs were being told if they had proved positive for Covid they should go home, which is what she did and for which she is now being punished.
Don’t take your rightful angerat the deliberate and reckless actions of the likes of Boris Johnson attending parties etc out on Margaret Ferrier. Given the circumstances at the time and the continued tremendous effort she has put in for constituents who have needed her help over the years, which many of you will be unaware of, I hope those of you in her constituency will not sign the recall petition and force a by-election.
Jim Stamper
Bearsden
I’M sure I read or heard somewhere that Rees-Mogg stated that Johnson, his beloved old school chum, parliamentarian and sponsor toward his oblivion into the House of Lords, had done great things for Scotland during his term as Prime Minister.
As to what they were, I can o nly presume his curious buddy means the great self-centred reckless oaf has greatly increased the early likelihood of the demise of the UK having proven beyond doubt that it is a cesspit of deception, exploitation and corruption under inglorious Westminster, the hitherto apparently immovable barrier to Scotland’s thriving future.
Tom Gray
Braco
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here