Oh Sergeant, is this the adventure you meant
When I put my name down on the line
All that talk of computers and sunshine and skis
Oh, I’m askin’ you, sergeant, where’s mine
The chorus of Billy Connolly’s song Sergeant, Where’s Mine? came to mind as I walked around Dunbar harbour. The Big Yin’s song was exposing the hypocrisy of the sales pitch for the military.
But the song also applies to Scotland and renewable energy. Scotland is energy rich, yet more than half of Scots are fuel poor.
From the shores of East Lothian, I could see preparations for offshore wind farms that can transform Scotland. But where’s the benefit for our communities, the wealth for our country, never mind the businesses and jobs that should follow from this natural bounty?
Earlier that day, I met fuel poverty campaigners
Recent good weather can’t hide the fact that not just cold but harsh times are coming.
Energy prices are dropping, but they’ll still be far higher than before the crisis began. Wages and benefits haven’t kept pace with food – let alone fuel – inflation.
For some it won’t be choosing between heating or eating, it’ll be neither.
The Tory government may hope folk will simply endure and view the reduction in energy prices as a respite, soaking up the pain as they suffer from that euphemism of “self-disconnection”.
READ MORE: Scotland 'has more tidal stream capacity than rest of world combined'
It’s a political weasel word as wicked as “collateral damage” is in war, simply meant to dehumanise suffering.
This is as tragic as Billy Connolly’s squaddie lying in his hospital bed. But it’s also perverse, as this simply shouldn’t be happening in Scotland. Our land already provides almost 100% of its domestic energy from renewables.
In East Lothian, wind farms on the Lammermuir Hills can be seen by almost every town and village.
Soon they’ll be joined by the offshore revolution. Giant turbines will be visible along the coastline that should be transforming our country, as well as playing their part in saving our planet.
One wind farm alone, Berwick Bank, will produce more energy than we have households in Scotland. a And it’s just one of many, not only in the Firth but all around our coasts.
According to a parliamentary answer I received, 35 terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity was expected to flow from Scotland to the rest of the UK in 2021 and by 2030 it was anticipated to be 124 TWh. Let’s put that into context: 1000 kilowatts = one megawatt; 1000 megawatts = one gigawatt; 1000 gigawatts = one terawatt.
One terawatt is therefore 1,000,000,000 (one billion) kilowatts. We’ll be sending 124 billion south.
How much do we use in Scotland?
An average household in Scotland uses under 4000 KWh per annum, and the whole of Scotland only requires six gigawatts.
We should be quids in and able to supply our people with cheap renewable energy, not power charged at the expensive price of European gas.
More than that, we should be benefiting from the industry’s wealth and seeing jobs and businesses grow. But that won’t happen unless we act.
READ MORE: Bodinglee Wind Farm project seeks South Lanarkshire council approval
At the moment, offshore energy is being sold off to big corporates, the painful irony being that while many are state companies, none of them are Scottish – or even British.
Along from Dunbar, the energy from the Neart Na Gaoithe is coming ashore. It’s some 15 miles from the Fife coast, at the mouth of the Firth. It’s owned by EDF and ESB, the French state energy company and Ireland’s state electricity board. The Irish Consul General told me it’s their largest investment ever outside the Emerald Isle.
There are some six state companies who either wholly own or have a significant stake in Scotland’s offshore wind – and others on land. That’s absurd.
And where are the jobs?
The turbines are being built abroad while, across the Firth, BiFab stands idle.
At Neart Na Gaoithe, a constituent who was a seafarer was laid off, along with others from the UK, and replaced by low-paid south Asian labour.
In the new world that’s coming, workers will be living in flotels or other onboard accommodation and – being outside territorial waters – won’t be covered by the National Minimum Wage. We can’t allow this to happen.
Our communities and our country must benefit from this bounty, not be robbed as happened with oil and gas. We need immediate action at Holyrood and Westminster, but ultimately we require not just independence but a radical vision for our land.
As ever, similar-sized nations to our own have shown what can be done, even with less natural resources than we possess.
READ MORE: Scotland and Orkney 'ideal' location to lead global tidal energy push
At the moment, although onshore wind provides for a community benefit, there’s no provision for offshore. Ireland has specified that from its lesser resource, communities hosting offshore infrastructure will benefit to at least €24 million a year.
Certainly better than the zilch that Westminster currently provides for East Lothian and other areas.
Denmark is taking a 20% stake in every offshore wind field. So should we. Such stakes should be sought from existing ones too (there’s no harm in asking). We need to establish a state energy company, which even Wales is doing.
We must also demand that it is written into contracts that some turbines are purchased locally, even though many will still need to be imported. Contracts must go to local businesses and work must be available for people who live in Scotland.
The renewable revolution must benefit Scotland and Scots must not be exploited. We’re energy rich and our folk must benefit from our natural bounty. All I’m demanding is what’s ours.
Clarification
In a previous version of this column, Kenny MacAskill wrote: "Our land already provides almost 100% of its domestic energy from renewables." We would like to clarify that this should read: "Our land already provides the equivalent of almost 100% of its domestic electricity from renewables." As set out by Sir Robert Chote, chair of the UK Statistics Authority, in 2020, gross electricity consumption in Scotland (electricity generated less net transfers) was 32,518 GWh, or approximately equal to renewable generation. As a gross measure, this does not mean that all the electricity used in Scotland came from renewable sources.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel