SCOTLAND’S NHS is in the grip of its worst crisis in 75 years. Waiting times and waiting lists are at record levels. Staff morale is at its lowest ever, with vacancies at their highest. Our health service survived the pandemic but in doing so exposed lethal shortcomings in this country’s social care provision.
Unable to keep promises made about the length of time patients would spend suffering outside accident and emergency departments, or waiting for diagnosis and much-needed operations, NHS Scotland is meanwhile haemorrhaging huge sums of money in payments to the private companies which now own and control much of this key public service.
Billions of pounds that should be spent on improving patient care are pouring out of the NHS and into the accounts of commercially motivated consortia with which our political representatives signed lucrative (for them at least) Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contracts.
Here’s a question for you. What do Consort Healthcare Ltd, H DGH Ltd, Summit Healthcare Ltd, Forth Health Holdings Ltd, Stobhill Healthcare Facilities Ltd, Macquarie Capital Solutions and Dumfries Facilities Holdings Ltd all have in common?
Answer, they are the companies which own Scotland’s seven PFI hospitals. That’s right, Edinburgh’s Royal Infirmary, Hairmyres, University Hospital Wishaw, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Stobhill Hospital in Glasgow, Edinburgh’s Sick Kids and Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary are not owned by the NHS.
READ MORE: Fringe show cancelled after Graham Linehan features on line-up
The first five were privatised by Labour, the last two by the SNP. Both parties having vehemently condemned PFI in opposition, then employed it in government. There is a word for such betrayal of the NHS, but I’m too polite to use it in the pages of a family newspaper.
Had NHS Scotland built these hospitals itself, the billions of pounds saved could have been spent on essential operations. Instead, the exorbitant payments to these privately owned hospitals eat away at our NHS every single day. The cost of the above seven facilities would have been £2 billion if they had been constructed by the NHS via the public purse in the usual way. The actual charge over the lifetime of these contracts will be nearer £10bn.
Seventy-seven such “initiatives” were signed off by governments across Britain over the past 20 years (source: UK Department of Health and Social Care).
In the case of University Hospital Wishaw, Scottish Government figures show that the £100 million facility, which opened in 2002, will cost NHS Lanarkshire £813m over the 25-year life of the contract. Eight times as much!
READ MORE: Edzell Traveller encampment toilet row raised with EHRC
Similarly, Edinburgh’s Royal Infirmary, which would have cost £350m to build publicly in 2002, will see NHS Lothian charged £1.2bn by the end of 2028.
And, as if their record wasn’t bad enough, Labour intends to push further privatisation on to our NHS.
While a recent YouGov poll found 84% of voters wanted to see healthcare publicly provided, Sir Keir Starmer, his health spokesperson Wes Streeting and Scotland’s only Labour MP, Ian Murray (in whose constituency Edinburgh’s two PFI hospitals sit), aim to increase the role the private sector plays in delivering NHS services.
“We believe we have a responsibility to utilise the private sector,” they say, adding “those who can afford to, should pay to go private” (source: Ian Murray’s open letter on NHS privatisation May 12, 2023).
In other words the wealthy will get treatment, but the rest of us will not. So much for protecting the central principle of “universality” designed by Aneurin Bevan in 1948 when the NHS was founded!
READ MORE: Alba advert attacking 'vampire' Rishi Sunak rejected by Global
The Scottish Socialist Party has campaigned steadfastly against privatisation for 25 years. We can be found on Princes Street every week, for example, petitioning people to support returning Edinburgh’s two PFI hospitals to the NHS. This is something we seek for all of Scotland’s privatised health facilities.
In our view, PFI contracts should be renegotiated to ensure our hospitals are returned to NHS ownership and the public gets far better value for its money.
Why should we wait until 2027, for example, to return Edinburgh Royal Infirmary to the NHS when the service is losing money at the rate it is? It is entirely reasonable to insist that the terms of these commercial contracts should be revisited given what we now know.
Such negotiations take place every day of the week in the corporate world. Our elected politicians need to show some leadership in this regard.
Curing Scotland’s worst public health crisis must therefore involve escaping from punitive PFI contracts and redeploying the money saved into much-needed frontline care. Public opinion is Scotland will accept nothing less.
We, the people of Scotland, have made it abundantly clear time and again, that we want our NHS to be owned by, and accountable to, the people of Scotland, not profiteering private companies of which we are allowed to know little.
Colin Fox is the SSP’s national spokesperson
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel