ASKED for his thoughts on fox hunting, Oscar Wilde quipped: “It’s the unspeakable in pursuit of the uneatable.”
The Tory approach to immigration often looks much the same. A full-throated pursuit of those desperate enough to pitch up on sewage-encrusted southern shores.
Not that Labour offers much succour for asylum seekers. Ever frightened of scaring the bitter anti-immigrant vote, Labour remains largely silent; explaining that reform is impossible because “there’s no money”.
The full idiocy of Westminster’s blueprint is illustrated in the utter shambles of their barge plan. They committed £1.6 billion to house asylum seekers in two barges. One was destined for Glasgow before the SNP administration wisely scuppered that idea.
READ MORE: Home Office told 'Glasgow does not support barge on River Clyde'
The remaining barge started operations in breach of fire regulations. Then, when it began boarding a number of unfortunate people it was discovered the vessel is a biohazard harbouring Legionnaires disease. The Home Office took its usual time to act.
So poor was their performance that even Tories deplored its absurdity.
“The barge is becoming a bit like the seven plagues of Egypt out of the Bible. First, we had the fire issue, then we had Legionnaires disease. It’s an ongoing disaster. Like an episode of Fawlty Towers,” said Tory Dorset county councillor Louie O’Leary.
In this latest British screw-up, taxpayers now find that, after spending £140 million on Rwanda and £1.6bn on barges, the UK now has no one in Rwanda and no one on a barge. Astonishingly, the Home Office minister, Suella Braverman, is still in post.
All this time her boss, the Prime Minister, endlessly chants; “Stop the Boats”. It is having little effect except to encourage extremist radio hosts in turn to shout; “Let’s machine gun the boats!”
This leaves the clear impression that the Tories are reconciled to losing the next General Election, and all their energies are now deployed toward shoring up their base vote. Since the party has moved significantly to the right, this means appeasing the very worst in British society. Despite this rightward lurch, the polls are not encouraging.
Over 80% of those polled by Ipsos recently say the Tories are doing a bad job “improving the health service”. While almost as many, 78%, say they are failing “to manage immigration”. As this is their flagship policy, you can understand why there is wholesale panic in Tory ranks.
READ MORE: Row as Kenmore council sends Murdo Fraser article out to mailing list
Facing defeat, the Tories will likely wreck the country ahead of the next election, leaving the new incumbents to clear up the mess. Labour will be elected largely by default. People are not reassured by a Labour leadership that ducks every commitment pleading “we don’t know what money is left”. So, the electorate will hold its nose and vote them in, but likely with a small majority.
That’s when the trouble really begins. Labour have sworn “to make Brexit work”. Even the dogs in the street know this is nuts. In voting for Brexit, the UK shot itself in both feet. Even walking upright will now be a challenge.
The British state will continue to putrefy, largely because of Brexit, and Labour will come under ever greater pressure. They will be forced to spend. Then, up will go the cry: “Same old Labour, spending money that’s not there.”
They will be very lucky indeed to last until the election after next.
It could have been oh-so different. Had Labour espoused constitutional reform all would have changed. Instead of aping the Tories in stuffing the House of Lords with electoral rejects, Labour could have made constitutional improvements. For instance, they could have swept away the discredited first-past-the-post voting system.
A proportional system, such as that used in Scotland, would have prevented the Tories from being continually re-elected as they have been over recent decades.
Faced with a rapidly worsening situation, Labour will panic. They will likely recant on “making Brexit work” and seek to rejoin the European Union in some form. The media will be merciless, screaming “Labour U-turn”, at every opportunity.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar says Scots have the right to wish for a second referendum
Meanwhile in Scotland, the short-lived triumphalism prompted by the appointment of Ian Murray as Secretary of State will disappear rapidly. He will likely begin his term of office appealing to SNP MPs to support the Labour government and end it as a figure of fun, like the present incumbent.
In the longer term, the Tories will return to power at Westminster thanks to the broken electoral system. And Labour can look forward to many years in the wilderness as the British state crumbles around us.
Wise heads will point to the lack of integrity as the fundamental flaw in UK governance.
As most know, if there weren’t double standards at Westminster, there wouldn’t be any standards at all.
It’s past time for independence. Declare YOUR independence today.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel