SCOTLAND stands at a pivotal moment in history. We are a nation whose aspirations for independence have swelled over the years, stoked by the promise of a future where our country’s destiny is in the hands of the people who live here.
Yet, as we draw closer to that future, the movement that was supposed to carry us there seems fractured and adrift.
I joined the SNP because I believed in the party’s commitment to independence. It was this common cause that swept me into the Scottish Parliament in 2016, riding on the wave of optimism that followed the 2014 referendum. Many of us thought independence was just around the corner. We thought wrong.
Despite repeated promises of an imminent independence referendum, the SNP leadership has now pivoted towards nebulous terms such as a “democratic effect,” with no clear timeline in sight.
Such ambiguity not only betrays the aspirations of the Yes movement but also risks squandering the mandate for independence that we have all worked so hard to build.
READ MORE: Neale Hanvey: Ash Regan joining Alba is a game changer
My decision to join the Alba Party stems from a steadfast dedication to the mandate given to me by voters – the unrelenting pursuit of independence. In Alba, I find a party that echoes this focus unequivocally. As Alba’s inaugural Member of the Scottish Parliament and the party’s leader at Holyrood, I am resolved to uphold this singular focus and unwavering commitment.
Let me be clear. Independence is not merely an end goal – it will be Scotland’s new beginning. It will be a catalyst for creating a country that leads the way in living standards, economic resilience, and innovation.
The country that gave the world the Enlightenment, penicillin, and the telephone surely has the compulsion and ingenuity to re-imagine and reinvent itself for a 21st-century future.
While there are those who argue that the independence movement is too fragmented to succeed, I see diversity of thought and approach as a strength rather than a weakness.
Yes, Alba and the SNP have differences, but they are differences in strategy, not in the end goal.
And often a diversity of tactics is exactly what is needed to accomplish bold objectives.
As I take up the mantle of leadership for Alba at Holyrood, I extend an invitation to all those who believe in independence to join us in strengthening Scotland’s cause, whether that’s within our party or working in tandem with us. Let’s set aside our past differences and work towards our common goal.
The SNP and Alba may be different vehicles, but both are necessary and we can, should and must all get back to driving in the same direction.
Together we can use the democratic instruments we have at our disposal to proactively pursue and achieve independence at every election opportunity going forward.
We must also be clear about what would constitute an unequivocal outcome. A high bar that we will aspire to is “50%-plus” of votes using the only gold standard there is – the ballot box. This would be a clear and definitive “mandate to begin negotiating Scotland’s independence” from a Union which has long since served its purpose.
Therefore, in the spirit of collaboration and clear purpose, I promise an open-door policy of friendship and co-operation with all pro-independence parties and groups. We may debate fiercely on policy issues, but let’s never again be swayed from our focus on the bigger picture – a free and independent Scotland.
So, to independence supporters feeling disillusioned or politically homeless, I say: there is a place for you in Alba, a place where your voice will be heard and your efforts valued.
And to those many good and decent nationalists who remain in the SNP, know that you may have lost a despondent colleague, but you have gained a determined ally.
Let’s not allow past divisions to distract us from the prize that is almost within our reach. It’s time to refocus, reconnect and reinvigorate the cause of Scottish independence – together.
We are at a crossroads. Our ability to work together, and the path we choose now, will define Scotland for generations to come.
Let’s make sure we travel the path that leads to independence, that leads to prosperity and dignity for all who choose to live in this beautiful and ancient country.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel