BONFIRE night may not yet be upon us but the fireworks have started early at Holyrood.
The row over the materials handed over to the UK Covid Inquiry by the Scottish Government continues into its second week, with both the Scottish Tory and Labour leader making it the focus of their questions at FMQs on Thursday.
Douglas Ross began by asking the First Minister why, given that the Scottish Government was told to retain all messages relevant to the pandemic in June 2021, it introduced a policy five months later to destroy WhatsApp messages.
He described this as ‘’the digital equivalent of building a bonfire to torch the evidence.’’ In response, the First Minister said the policy was a general policy around mobile messaging.
‘’It was made very clear to officials…that any information that was relevant or could be potentially relevant to the inquiries should be retained. That is why 14,000 WhatsApp messages are in the process of being handed over’’ he said.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf unveils further £250,000 to support people in Gaza
Humza Yousaf then made a promise to hand over his own WhatsApp messages from the time, in full and unredacted and made a comparison between that pledge and the behaviour of Boris Johnson, who is still refusing to hand over his WhatsApp messages.
Talk then turned to Nicola Sturgeon and previous assurances she had given that all messages would be handed over to the inquiry.
Time is short and winter is coming, so I’ll just summarise the exchange between the party leaders.
Douglas Ross: ‘’Nicola Sturgeon is the worst!’’
Humza Yousaf: ‘’Nicola Sturgeon is the best!’’
I, for one, would like to search through the WhatsApp history of both men for mentions of the former First Minister to read the unredacted versions of both sentiments.
READ MORE: Private Eye issues statement after cartoonist resigns over 'death threat'
Shortly after this, the chuntering began. Stephen Kerr was named as one of the culprits – and was asked by the presiding officer to ‘’cease shouting from your seat’’ - but members across the aisle were also at it.
This might be because they feel passionately about the subject at hand and are keen to show vocal support for their respective party leaders.
Or, as is far more likely, they want to see just how noisy they have to be to convince the ever-patient Alison Johnstone to finally use her wee gavel.
‘’I cannot believe that Humza Yousaf has just stood up and, in the strongest possible way, defended Nicola Sturgeon, who has been accused of deleting vital WhatsApp messages!’’ bellowed Douglas Ross.
His self-professed disbelief at the notion that a politician might launch into a partisan defence of somebody from their own side would ring more true if Douglas Ross himself hadn’t been so infamously indecisive about whether serial liar and lawbreaker Boris Johnson should resign.
READ MORE: Celtic fans hit back after accusations of 'antisemitism'
Anas Sarwar was up next and he accused the First Minister of ‘’dodging responsibility’’ over the messages row.
“The harsh reality is this, the First Minister has lost control of his government. He doesn’t know how many ministers or officials have complied with the do not destroy notice, he doesn’t know how many have deleted messages.’’
He said the First Minister had promised that his government and officials would hand over all messages and asked “should we conclude that his word means nothing?’’
The fiery session ended with an ‘’unequivocal guarantee’’ from the First Minister that ‘’the messages that we have retained will absolutely be handed over and handed over in full.’’
You could tell by the outraged shouts of ‘’have retained?’’ from opposition backbenchers that this is a subject we are likely to return to at next week’s FMQs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel