WITH Parliament prorogued until Tuesday, the leaders of the two main parties had some time to focus on their passions.
Keir Starmer got to get stuck into suspending the whip from one of his MPs that he doesn’t like, while Rishi Sunak got to geek out about artificial intelligence with the world’s richest man.
Starmer’s woes over Gaza grew greater this week with two Labour council leaders in England today calling for him to quit over his stance on the conflict, which his critics say makes him look compassionless and unable to call out what they say are war crimes committed by Israel.
Anas Sarwar to Sadiq Khan to Andy Burnham have all broke ranks and called for a ceasefire. Just shy of a third of Labour MPs back that position.
Taking questions after a speech today, Starmer argued that he wanted to “alleviate” the suffering of innocent civilians in Gaza – but that a “humanitarian pause” was best to achieve this, not a ceasefire.
Asked about what his “red lines” for Israel were, Starmer ducked the question, giving critics the space to interpret that as Labour giving carte blanche to Israel while it’s accused by human rights organisations of using chemical weapons in Gaza and collectively punishing Palestinians for Hamas’s attacks.
But the pressure is not going to go away and as the conflict worsens, as seems likely with the evacuation of British nationals – including Humza Yousaf’s in-laws – and preparations for a full-scale ground invasion of Gaza, Starmer will continue to face questions about his uncritical support of Israel.
Poll position
But he may be cheered by two polls this week which appeared to show a Labour resurgence in Scotland, at least for the upcoming Westminster election.
One conducted more recently put the SNP and Labour neck and neck, while another from the respected Scottish Election Study gave Starmer’s party a six-point lead.
The latter is thought to have been the first time since 2014 that Labour have held a lead over the SNP in a Westminster poll.
Meanwhile Sunak’s AI summit at Bletchley Park – where the agents who broke the secrets of the Enigma Code once worked – seems to have achieved some progress on focusing minds on the dangers of AI, though critics have pointed out it lacked concrete regulation for AI companies.
Musk's mini-me
It’s worthy stuff but no one can pretend the real draw wasn’t a pre-recorded interview with the PM and Twitter/X owner Elon Musk, the richest man in the world.
They told us how we might one day have AI friends, while Musk said there may be a future where “no job is needed” and people only work for their own satisfaction.
But in amongst the far-out techno futurism, Sunak once again revealed his lack of the common touch when he said he wanted the UK to adopt the frontier spirit of Silicon Valley where people “are unafraid to give up the security of a regular pay cheque to go and start something and be comfortable with failure”.
It would help one overcome the fear of failure if your education cost more than the deposit for a house, rise through the ranks of one of the world’s biggest banks then marry into one of the richest families in India.
And finally, another week brings yet another Tory scandal as one of Sunak’s MPs is found guilty of racially abusing a protester.
Bob Stewart, the MP for Beckenham, has kept the Tory whip throughout the investigation into his conduct when he told a protester to “go back to Bahrain” after being heckled outside an event in December last year.
At time of writing, there was radio silence from the Tories on what the guilty verdict meant for Stewart’s membership of the parliamentary party.
Subscribers get the Worst of Westminster sent direct to their inboxes for free every Friday at 6pm. Sign up here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here