IF Donald Trump was US president again right now, how would he have handled the crisis in the Middle East? Come to think of it, how would Trump handle the ongoing war in Ukraine?
Yes, that war is still in full vicious tilt as we rapidly approach the second anniversary of the Russian invasion, though you could be forgiven for thinking otherwise given the dearth of news coverage.
Isn’t it odd how the international news agenda these days appears increasingly unable to handle more than one big international story at a time? Committing its resources wholesale recently as it has to the Israel-Hamas conflict, it’s all too easy to lose sight of other really significant stories going on in the world.
Trump and the possibility of him once again becoming president is one such story. But before we consider the bad news, let’s take stock of the positives for the Democrats.
No doubt Joe Biden will be a tad relieved that his Democratic Party has recently secured victories in a series of state and local elections.
Twelve months ahead of a presidential election in which Biden is set to seek a second four-year term, his party saw off Republican rivals, with a Democratic governor re-elected in Kentucky.
READ MORE: SNP use King's Speech amendment to force Labour into ceasefire vote
In Ohio, meanwhile, voters there dealt a blow to the Republican governor by allowing Democrats to reclaim control of the state legislature. These wins along with Democratic victories in local elections in Pennsylvania would suggest so far, so good for Biden.
But take a closer look at the bigger polls and things are not so rosy.
With barely a year to go until the crunch date on November 5, 2024, a New York Times/Siena College poll this week showed Biden losing to Trump in five of the six swing states that will almost certainly decide the result of the 2024 elections.
Voters also said they trusted Trump to do a better job on handling the economy (59% to 37% for Biden), on immigration (53% to 41%) and even on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (50% to 39%).
Sure, polls are just a snapshot in time and public opinion wavers, but let’s just say Trump wins – what could the world expect from him as the next US leader?
Well, you don’t have to look far for an answer on the domestic front given that most of it is laid out on Trump’s campaign website in the shape of a plan that’s been dubbed Agenda47 – a reference to Trump becoming America’s 47th president, if he wins.
These range from the fantastical – or egotistical – such as the building of “freedom cities” on empty federal land, where Americans can live and work without “burdensome regulations”.
It includes rounding up the homeless – sound familiar? – to get them off the streets and move them to tent camps outside US cities until their “problems can be identified”. In short, it’s all very Trump.
But what of his international agenda? I ask because governments around the world faced with the serious prospect of his re-election are already trying to anticipate the foreign policies of a second Trump administration.
Well, the first thing the international community would have to realise let alone contend with is that it would be dealing with a man who tried to subvert his own country’s democracy. That in itself would be a green light to despots and their ilk everywhere.
For many, the US’s role as the bastion and protector of democracy and human rights is already severely in question under Biden as his administration’s largely unquestioning support of Israel has shown over the continuing bombing of Gaza.
But like it or not, America still commands a central point in the eyes of many countries and their leaders when it comes to the trust on which many current alliances with the US are based. In a nutshell, the implications for Washington’s allies would be immense.
Take Ukraine, for example. Under Trump, it’s pretty much a certainty that the US would reduce the scope or enforcement of sanctions against Russia.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak admits Palestine protest won't clash with Remembrance event
It’s very much a given too that Trump as president would at the very least slow supplies of weapons, munitions and other materiel to the Kyiv government, all of course justified under putting America first.
Should Trump choose such a strategy, then ironically it would likely have the opposite effect, for whether one likes the idea or loathes it, America’s global clout has been greatly enhanced in the eyes of many by its support for Ukraine.
Alongside such moves, Trump would almost certainly also step up his past intimidation and threats against Washington’s international treaties, in other words Nato and bilateral treaties with South Korea and Japan.
Prospective relations with China would also be up for grabs, though here they might not be all that dramatic because US hostility to China is to be found within both Republican and Democrat ranks.
Where Trump differs from Biden on this, of course, is that the former couldn’t give a jot about ideology or political philosophy or “containing” China. Autocracies, democracies, they are all one to Trump whose main beef with Beijing is economic.
Business, money and who is the biggest deal-maker would be the motivators here for Trump though God only knows what the geopolitical implications of that might turn out to be in terms of China’s response.
READ MORE: Carol Vorderman praised after being forced to quit BBC job
Which brings me to the Middle East. Recently, of course, Trump lashed out against Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, albeit driven by Netanyahu’s apparent cosiness with Biden. In short, to quote one former Trump adviser: “He’s pissed off because Bibi praised Biden and the Biden White House for being supportive.”
But were Trump to be re-elected, few doubt that he would adopt the usual US default position within US-Israeli relations, even if that also meant putting bad blood between him and Netanyahu behind them – working, of course, on the assumption that Trump regains power and Netanyahu remains in office.
And so there we have it, for despite a post-presidential impeachment trial, four ongoing criminal trials for 91 alleged felonies and efforts by Republican challengers for the party’s nomination in 2024, Trump remains the frontrunner.
The inescapable fact then is that in all, a return of Trump to the White House, while not inevitable, is evidently and disturbingly plausible. Given the parlous state of the global political scene right now, that is quite a prospect. Even more worrying is that it’s one that both America and the wider world seem to be sleepwalking into.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel