ENGLAND has a major sewage problem. Untreated filth is repeatedly discharged in to its rivers and on its beaches, putting the public at great risk. But Scotland has a similar problem – not with a water company but with a state broadcaster.
The public here is daily, and sometimes hourly, exposed to untreated or maltreated political sewage. Most times the BBC sewer produces deliberate foulness, and occasionally its effluent is accidental. But it’s commonly negative; whether by design or neglect. BBC Scotland are founding members of ESIC – Everything Scottish is Crap.
Take curling this week. The Scottish men’s and women’s teams are doing well in the current European Curling Championships. Want to watch and cheer them on? Don’t try the BBC, the so-called national broadcaster. Despite its multi-million-pound budget, BBC Scotland cannot deliver.
Likewise, when it comes to coverage of the successful Scotland men’s football team, you need to go elsewhere to see games live. Another BBC failure.
READ MORE: John Drummond: Immoral UK isn’t working – because failure is baked in
While it may be poor at providing Scottish coverage, it is red hot about what you may not see. At the recent Scottish Bafta awards, complaints were made about the situation in Gaza. All were swiftly edited out by the “impartial” Beeb. It has form. But sometimes its antipathy to all things Scottish puts Scots at serious risk and may indeed have resulted in needless deaths and sickness.
At the peak of the Covid pandemic, the Scottish branch of the BBC actively sought to undermine the Scottish Government’s essential public health messages, at one point construing these as “political” at the prompting of a few unelected politicians. It put Scots in danger.
BBC Scotland vigorously promoted scare stories about care homes et al. Sometimes these tales emerged from a single individual, but all were treated as if they were holy writ. Government ministers’ time was constantly abused as they were quizzed repeatedly over nonsense. And this happened at a time when everyone was needed to deal with real people getting really sick.
Worse, any baloney emanating from Westminster at that time was given top billing. UK Government twaddle was commonly reported uncritically. There was little or no analysis. If it came from Downing Street, it ran – unedited. No British ministers were doorstepped. No untutored critics of British health policies were headlined, in contrast to their Scottish counterparts.
The BBC errors were sickening. People died. But drivel from Westminster was stoutly promoted. Now, it turns out, a lot of what Downing Street was saying and doing was truly “political”. Health experts were ignored over the need to push political fads.
For example, we now learn that Eat Out To Help Out – the disastrous wheeze concocted by the present PM when chancellor – was introduced without any consultation with health officials. Witnesses to the Covid inquiry presently under way claim that people died because of UK Government decisions.
Anyone watching BBC Scotland at that time could have been forgiven for thinking that Eat Out To Help Out was an excellent idea. Without a qualm, they went overboard promoting the views of Scottish Tories, saying this was a super idea. We will possibly never know quite how many Scots died because of this politically inspired gibberish.
Some say the BBC is not free of scrutiny. And this is true. It is scrutinised by Westminster and, as in most things, Westminster gets what Westminster wants – thanks to our crap “constitution” that puts politicians ahead of the people.
Officially, the BBC is overseen by Ofcom, the body responsible for media matters in the UK. But, in common with its counterpart covering the water companies, it is largely toothless. What is truly extraordinary is that the British government sought to remove the few teeth it has.
According to Alan Rusbridger, former editor of The Guardian, they tried to fix Ofcom. The Tory-run BBC actually bid to put its own man in as head of Ofcom – and their favourite was none other than the then editor of the Daily Mail!
READ MORE: Tim Davie shows BBC is British Backscratching Corporation
Think about this for a second. A body overseen by a regulator wanted to pervert its own regulator. In a sane world, the BBC ought to have no part in choosing who scrutinises them. But the British media world is far from sane.
I know that some folks will counter there are honest people in the BBC and that these folks strain for more balance in its reporting.
In answer I would paraphrase the late, great Iain Banks: “I am not saying there are no decent people in BBC Scotland, but they are like bits of sweetcorn in a turd, technically they have kept their integrity, but they are still embedded in shit.”
What’s particularly worrying is that absent direct oversight by the Scottish people, the lie of the land may damage even more Scots.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel