This week's edition of In Common comes from Amanda Burgauer, the director of Common Weal. You can receive the newsletter every Thursday straight in your inbox by clicking here.
THIS week in Parliament the Revive coalition held a reception to mark a significant change in Scottish land management as the grouse moor reform Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Bill passes through the Scottish Parliament. But we see this as the beginning, not the end.
This issue – Scotland's land – is pulling diverse interests together in a desire to change Scotland.
We intend to keep going. It’s encouraging to see legislation being created that addresses grouse moors, muirburn and the immorality of "killing to kill", the annual business of killing tens of thousands of wild animals to maximise the number of grouse in a grouse moor so they too can be killed.
Large swathes of Scotland are barren, over-grazed and with little biodiversity. Grouse moors and muirburn contribute enormously to that.
READ MORE: First Minister quizzed on golf course plans at protected Scottish site
The forest and woodland cover in Scotland sits around 18.5%, well below the European average of 38%.
The hillsides, that in other European countries would be forested, are bare and scarred by tracks and often difficult for the public to access.
Yet we hear grouse shooting brings economic benefit to rural communities, including the small payments to locals for casual work as beaters although the small amounts of income that trickle down to the beaters aren’t enough to create a sustainable life – and other jobs are often scarce.
We know that planting trees is a good thing – for carbon capture, to assist in flood defence, to promote increases in biodiversity and frankly to make our countryside feel healthier, more alive and more beautiful. But reforesting is also an enormous opportunity to create rural jobs and new rural industries.
We can replace much of the 80 per cent of our construction materials that we currently import, develop important materials needed for the retrofitting of our existing houses (particularly organic insulation products), create diverse materials industries (everything from bioplastics to fabric) and create the secondary manufacturing jobs that those materials can stimulate.
But only if the leaders of these new industries can get access to land and only if we can find people to work in these new industries.
That isn't where we are just now.
We’re losing our rural workforce because of a lack of housing. And the reason we have such a problem with rural housing is lack of land and lack of a strong enough rural economy. And the reason we have a weak rural economy is because it is cut off from the land it is based in.
The advanced technologies that can be created based on wood and other biocrops is impressive – the world's tallest wood-only skyscraper (so-called plyscrapers) is 26 floors high and there are taller ones planned.
READ MORE: Scots campaign to buy homeless people Christmas dinner
The world is moving ahead, but Scotland is still stuck because a tiny number of powerful landowners block communities from expanding.
It's all connected.
None of the problems that face Scotland (especially rural Scotland) can be tackled in isolation. That so many of these problems are directly influenced by Scotland's deeply unhealthy relationship to its own land is infuriating.
Our land is a natural resource that is essential to the wellbeing of Scotland’s people and its economy. It’s not normal for fewer than 500 people to control a country’s land and how it is managed.
In fact, we're the only developed economy in the world who has a system of land ownership anything like it.
We are in a cost-of-living crisis where people are so worried about their electricity bills, they are scared to turn on their heating. We have a housing crisis, where people are hard-pressed to find affordable homes.
We are experiencing climate impacts such as the devastating recent storms and floods that put communities at risk.
We have health and education systems that are struggling in a dreadfully centralised nation.
Energy? That's about land too. Food? Land. Flood mitigation? That's a land policy. Health? Energy, food and the benefits of exercise and being outdoors make an enormous difference. Democracy? That's about control over the places where we live – our land.
Do you see how many different issues which are crucial challenges for our nation lead us back to land?
And can you then see just how important land reform is to the social, environmental, and economic change we need to bring about in Scotland?
Last month the Revive coalition held a conference in Perth.
Seven hundred people attended. Probably fewer than a fifth of them were there solely or primarily for animal welfare reasons.
Others were worried about climate change. Some were angry about lack of local democracy. More were drive by social justice. Some just sense that 'something is wrong with our countryside' and wanted to know what to do about it.
A family member who came along, generally uninterested in grouse moors, left as a committed land reformer.
That is why this issue is so important and why next year Common Weal and the REVIVE coalition will focus on achieving serious land reform.
Land reform that has been promised for hundreds of years but somehow never happens. We intend to make sure that this time, change is real.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel