I THOUGHT it was a hoax. When The National ran a story in November saying that the Tory “Bullingdon boys” were set to reintroduce the pint measure for champagne, I’m ashamed to admit I had my doubts.
I should have known better. In truth, there is no idea so ridiculous that the current Westminster government would rule it out.
And so it came to pass just a couple of days ago that Rishi Sunak and the numbskulls who populate his Cabinet announced they were indeed going to re-introduce the pint measure, not just for champagne but for wine. Making the announcement on Wednesday, the Department for Business and Trade said the change was made possible by Brexit, as if that was a good thing.
Britain, we were told, could now toast the Brexit “dividend” with pints of wine!?
READ MORE: Review of the year 2023: What’s happened in UK politics?
Back in the real world, the rest of us realise “making Brexit happen” has brought us precisely no benefits, no “dividend” and a whole heap of pain. The same will undoubtedly be true of this latest wheeze. The new measure is reportedly optional. So too is another hare-brained idea to encourage producers of pint beer glass to add a crown.
But both are indications of the current thinking of a party driven to leave all the benefits of the European Union by a lunatic desire to return to the “good old days” when Britain was supposedly great.
And never forget there were enough people who believed them to drag Scotland out of the EU despite our 60% vote to remain. Remember too that, although we may not know any of them, 7.84 million people viewed the King’s speech on Christmas Day TV, propelling it to the top of the viewing ratings for the day.
There have already been indications that the Tories want to bring back imperial measures such as pounds and ounces. This, according to a UK Government consultation into the issue, would allow us to “capitalise on the benefits of Brexit”.
The consultation’s recommendations do not currently extend beyond pints of wine but, as I have already said, there are no suggestions too bonkers to be accepted by the current occupant of 10 Downing Street.
This is a government determined to put as much distance as possible between the UK and Europe as possible. A government determined not just to halt any extension of devolution but to roll back on those powers previously agreed.
For proof look no further than this paper’s front page story yesterday revealing that spending on staff at the UK Government Scottish Office has now soared above £1m.
READ MORE: Johnny Mercer panned for saying Carol Vorderman has 's*** lonely life'
Of course, we don’t know exactly how many staff the Scottish Office actually employs. It says it doesn’t know the figure for that.
We do know that the £1m is just a part of the £11m it costs every year to run the Scottish Office. We do know that the Scottish Office under Tory Secretary of State Alister Jack is increasingly opposing the democratic decision of the Scottish Parliament.
The issues of trans rights and the bottle return scheme have seen clashes between Jack and Holyrood and there will almost certainly be more. A pint of wine is just another indication that the Great Britain philosophy has taken root in the UK. The longer we have to wait for the next General Election the more difficult it will be to shift, particularly because the Labour Party are giving no indication that it is at odds with the post-Brexit retreat back to the 50s.
This is not a future that resonates with Scots, who have increasingly been looking to the Scottish Parliament to represent their values, their beliefs, their hopes and fears.
Nevertheless, the Westminster election has a particular importance for Scotland. Of course, we want – desperately want – to be rid of the Tories. But more than that, we need to return MPs who will speak up for an engagement with the world rather than isolation, for humanity rather than inhumanity, for the values we believe in rather than those of a long-gone Great Britain.
Let’s vote for the fresh hopes of the future rather than a repeat of the failures of the past.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel