TWO conversations that I have had in the last week have made me think most particularly about the impact of the forthcoming General Election (whenever it might happen) in Scotland, as well as in Wales and Northern Ireland.
The first of these conversations was with a friend in London, who confidently told me that whenever he was watching a news item that referred to Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland he either turned the volume down, or turned the programme off. Although he is well aware of my politics and interests it did not seem to occur to him that making such a statement might be either inappropriate, or just offensive. His implication was that this is what a normal person in England would do, and I hate to admit it, but I think that my friend was probably right in making that assumption.
The second conversation was with the hosts of the Echo Chamber podcast, which is produced in Dublin, on which I am a guest about once a month. The start point for our conversation this month was my column in last week’s National, in which I offered five reasons why no one in Scotland should vote for Keir Starmer’s Labour Party.
READ MORE: Scots arrested at Keir Starmer protest call for BBC to release footage
Not long after the discussion started, Tony Groves, who is one of the hosts, asked me whether there really would be a national General Election in the UK sometime in the next 12 months, or whether instead quite different elections might take place in each of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. I had no hesitation in suggesting that it was the second of these two options that was going to occur because I really have no doubt that this will be the case.
Two thoughts follow from these conversations. The first is on how inappropriate the Union is when it is so obvious that the majority of people in England treat it with contempt. They might think that they still have an absolute right to control what they presume to be their remaining provinces, but the reality is that they have not the slightest interest in what happens in any of these countries.
It is, therefore, inevitable that at some point this Union will fail. It simply cannot be otherwise. There is no evidence that the continuing rule of a location by a government that is not only indifferent to, but actually antagonistic towards the people of the place that it seeks to control can ever work in the long term. Those believing in Scottish independence from the UK should take heart from this. However long it takes for the breakdown of the Union to occur, it certainly will.
The second sentiment relates to the General Election. However it is looked at, devolution in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland guarantees that this election cannot be on the same issues in those places as it is in England. Not only are the priorities and needs in each of these countries different from those in England, the ways in which people would wish those priorities be tackled and funded also differ considerably. Any party contesting this election that wants to pretend that they are playing by English rules, when the rules of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland actually apply deserves to be treated with contempt.
READ MORE: Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh: Lawyer's closing statement in ICJ case against Israel praised
Putting these thoughts together and standing back as someone who lives in England but who would like to see the splitting of the Union into four parts, this says something else to me. That is that whatever the differences between the parties seeking independence in each of these countries (and they do, of course, exist) there is incredibly good reason for them to co-operate to ensure that this message of difference between the countries in the Union is delivered collectively.
There is a common goal in rejecting rule from Westminster that is powerful, and ultimately about the creation of a common future that respects both similarities and differences, which is exactly what most in England refuse to do.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel