A REPORT last week reminded me of how important it will be, come the General Election, for the SNP to get out those groups who have a history of not voting but who, ironically, have the most to lose if we can no longer develop and implement progressive policies on taxation and benefits that help them most in these difficult times.
The report came from Open Britain, which describes itself as “a grassroots movement hundreds of thousands strong, fighting to make democracy work for everyone”.
The organisation insists “voter ID is being wielded as a political cudgel by this Conservative government”, excluding certain demographics of voters, with 14,000 people turned away at May elections last year and the Government still refusing to widen the list of acceptable ID cards.
The Electoral Commission, too, is concerned. Its chair, John Pullinger, has expressed doubts about the real intentions of the policy, observing accusations of voter exclusion under the guise of reform and the stringent rules proving a significant barrier to voting for certain (often marginalised) groups.
I agree with both. This matters for all of us but matters more for the SNP than for the other parties, including Labour. Dishonest media campaigns on SNP finances and, more recently, on pandemic management have reduced support in polls, so we have a real task to get out those who, were they properly informed by that same media, would realise what is in their clear interests.
READ MORE: Senior Tories dismiss ‘foolish’ call for Sunak to be ousted
We know this fairly certainly and objectively, based on repeated polls. In the most recent Ipsos MORI poll, in November 2023, SNP support was 3% higher among C2DE social class voters than among ABC1s but for Labour it was 7% lower. Interestingly, support for the Conservatives in this poll was 8% higher among the C2DE category.
This latter point highlights the need to inform this group of what is in their best interests economically and to counter notions of the Conservatives as guardians of traditional values.
A YouGov poll in October 2023 had almost exactly the same pattern of distribution, with the SNP ahead by 3% with C2DE voters, Labour ahead again by 7% with ABC1 voters and the Conservatives 3% ahead again with C2DE voters.
We see in both of these polls, evidence that Labour Party support is increasingly middle class. We know that this group turns out at elections. Is that why Labour are drifting so confidently to the right, to capture Conservative voters while trusting the ABC1 group to stay with them? And, contrary to their beginnings, are happy to abandon the C2DE group, knowing its apathy will make it less numerous on election day than the SNP need?
There is little likelihood that the SNP can persuade the hardcore of Conservative or Labour voters to switch to the SNP regardless of how much it would be in their economic interests.
Like poor Americans who vote Republican, “shooting themselves in the foot” economically speaking, because of hostility to minorities or to “liberal” values on women’s rights such as abortion, the Conservative but poor voters in Scotland are not listening.
And the Labour middle-class voters are either covering their ears when Keir Starmer speaks, have swallowed the need for some undefined change or have been duped by the media into believing an unfounded tale of SNP corruption.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel