This is from a newsletter from Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp, called Reinventing Scotland. It explores the wellbeing economy. Sign up here to receive it every Tuesday at 7pm.
How can a wellbeing culture inspire people and deliver a new nation?
I have seen a few blogs and articles recently bleating that the wellbeing economy is a gimmick and that the Scottish Government doesn't really understand the concept. Those are usually written by well-known left-wing commentators who see wellbeing as a threat to socialism.
The wellbeing economic approach is not purely economics but rather an integrated socio-economic mindset change. So if you think that taking the best (workable) ideas of socialism and mixing them successfully for the first time with the best (sustainable) ideas of capitalism to create an approach with a higher purpose is a threat, then I suppose it is.
A lot of the criticism is based around the time it takes to embed wellbeing thinking in the multilayered operations of government, Holyrood, councils, the NHS, the care service and various grant-awarding quangos such as Scottish Enterprise etc.
Yes it's frustrating and as I have spent a good portion of the last decade trying to champion the idea of a wellbeing economic approach I think I have more of a right to be frustrated than most. However, only an idiot would think that a government hamstrung by devolution in the middle of a cost of living crisis and a political crisis (the latter of its own making) can just wave a magic wand and make the transition happen overnight.
The pace of government is always frustrating to activists
That said, the transition has to accelerate, and although the Scottish Government has made a start with the Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill Consultation, I would like to challenge the Government to go further and to understand that the transition to a wellbeing economy needs to speed up if it is to form the foundations of a positive vision that will lead to an independent Scotland.
So the Scottish Government's Wellbeing and Sustainable Development Bill is a start, but it's only half of the formula. Consultations are fine and admittedly fixing the definitions, measurements, and understanding how it should impact on economic and environmental policy and planning at all levels of government and crucially how it relates to the performance frameworks are key elements of making wellbeing thinking the core theme of Scotland’s socio-economic planning.
Policies are boring, ownership is everything
However, none of that will easily seep into the culture of the nation. For the average voter to buy into this change they have to engage with it and to feel ownership of it.
It's a national culture change project and consulting with think tanks, academics, pressure groups and unions etc. Accessing professional opinion is fine, even necessary, but it's invisible to the public - and cultural change has to involve the public, even be driven by the public.
The Scottish Government has found this out with its massive consultation exercises on gender reform and the bottle return scheme (below), both of which went swimmingly until they crashed head first into cultural resistance and died.
When it comes to cultural change, emotional responses eat rational thought for breakfast. The pre-2014 National Conversation on independence was a cultural engagement, not a political consultation, and as such laid the groundwork for the increase in independence support that we have struggled to maintain through the wilderness years.
READ MORE: Labour peer wants early Holyrood election if SNP lose MP majority
Give the people alternative institutions and alternative visions
If we want to destroy the institutions that maintain London’s control over Scotland we must create alternative institutions, have them engage the people in the process of change and begin to act like the independent nation we aim to become, rather than give the impression that we will accept our half-nation status.
With the right approach the SNP can win a majority of seats at the next General Election and earn the mandate to set up a Constitutional Convention on Independence. That can be the vehicle for a new national engagement programme, a new national conversation on how independence with a wellbeing economic approach will enrich the lives of the people of Scotland, create the conditions for businesses to thrive in a sustainable way and save our environment. It can't be a government consultation, it needs to be an engagement of the people by the people - the core of a new phase of the independence movement.
It's a movement thing
That means that no political party, no one leader or organisation can lead the Constitutional Convention on Independence. The Congress must reflect the diversity of our country and the wellbeing, green and other the independence movements and parties.
Unity in the independence movement is impossible unless we move away from our addiction to political debate, from imagining that political policies will lead us to independence - they won't, they will just serve to divide us. The UK Government will do all in its power to block a referendum and keep the path to independence dependent on people voting SNP as they know not everyone wants to. They know if we become a non-political party-led movement again we will win and we will win big and so some form of cross-party alliance at a de facto Holyrood 2026 election will have to be considered.
READ MORE: Analysis predicts pro-independence majority in Scottish parliament
Scotland's new conversation has to be about our shared values, our shared culture and stories not of the past but of the future. This new Convention’s goal should be to let the dreams and aspirations of the people of Scotland shape the future institutions of an independent Scotland. Let's get started.
Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp is the CEO of Business for Scotland, the chief economist at the wellbeing economics think tank Scotianomics, the founder of the Believe in Scotland campaign and the author of Scotland the Brief.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel