I LISTENED to a recording of Danny Dorling’s January talk at an Edinburgh book store about his book Shattered Nation, which chronicles the UK’s precipitous decline.
Dorling, Professor of Human Geography at Oxford, began his remarks with a story of a European country that in 2020, when faced with the cost of living crisis and a pandemic, convened a government emergency committee and introduced a payment of £10 per week for each child under the age of six in families receiving benefits. In 2022 this was then increased to £25 per week for each child under the age of 16. For a family with three children, this meant an extra £4k per year. He asked the audience to guess which country he was talking about. Someone immediately responded, “Scotland.”
READ MORE: Ruth Wishart: Extremism, lost Labour and the rise of English nationalism
When he poses this question to his average English audience, he said it takes ten guesses to land on Scotland. That’s because England has no idea what Scotland has done to blunt Westminster welfare cuts or anything else for that matter.
The media doesn’t report it, although it has to be said Scotland’s Unionist media also doesn’t relish reporting things that Scotland does well.
Professor Dorling said the Scottish Child Payment is responsible for the biggest reduction in child poverty in a year anywhere in Europe since 1989. The Scottish administration accomplished this within the Westminster-imposed Barnett Formula budgetary straitjacket. It just goes to show that alleviating poverty is a political choice.
He gave a quick history of the UK’s economic deterioration and rising inequality. Both began at the end of the 1970s. In the 1960s, only Sweden had a lower rate of inequality than the UK. In 1974 inequality in the UK reached its lowest level, competing with Finland and Norway, and the UK had the highest life expectancy and lowest infant mortality rates in the world.
READ MORE: Mhairi Black taunts David Lammy after 'I'm a conservative' admission
From the 1980s it’s been downhill as neoliberalism, ushered in by Thatcher, took hold. By 1992 inequality in the UK was worse than in Portugal but Tory voters were doing well. New Labour did little to reverse inequalities. By 2016, only Bulgaria was more unequal than the UK. The UK Government’s excuse was “at least we’re not as bad as South Africa or Brazil.”
The 2008 financial crisis followed by Tory austerity and the pandemic have accelerated the UK’s social and economic nosedive. It’s telling that when the UK left the EU, the European Parliament lost its largest bloc of far-right MEPs made up of Ukip and the Tories.
The Resolution Foundation’s Living Standards Outlook 2023 reported that 56% of children in the UK with two siblings were going hungry two to three times per month, figures not seen since the 1930s. Imperial College’s School of Public Health found that the average height of children in the UK is falling – UK five-year-olds are shorter than their European counterparts. The height decline began in 1985 and experts suggest that poor nutrition is stunting their growth. In addition, UK life expectancy is decreasing while depression and other mental illnesses are soaring. Failure is being normalised. In my local grocery store, there’s a sign asking shoppers to donate to the local food bank. Food banks didn’t exist before 2000 – now there are more than 2,500.
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: Anas Sarwar will be beelin at UK Labour for ruining his anti-SNP line
This is why I routinely refer to the “failing UK.” A state is failing when it fails its people – their health, their welfare, their education, their futures.
And Keir Starmer’s English Labour Party, a party which Dorling says “lost its soul” in the late 1990s, is comfortably in bed with its corporate donors so won’t change the downward trajectory of this failing state.
The Scottish people need to make it crystal clear to their political leaders that they’ve had enough of this abuse and instruct them to end the Union.
Leah Gunn Barrett
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel