“TEETERING on the edge of poverty”, “living in poverty”, “in deep poverty”, “in very deep poverty”; the multiple categories of severe deprivation and insecurity described in the latest analysis from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation cannot begin to convey the cruel conditions of life imposed on millions by all the political parties of the millionaires (280k people in Scotland ‘£40-per-week away from being in poverty’, figures say, Jun 4).
People working 40, 50, even 60 hours a week simply to pay the most urgent bills, delaying payment of others, only then to find themselves in need of a food bank.
The pain and indignity of working parents being unable to properly feed and clothe their children.
READ MORE: Power-hungry Keir Starmer is claiming ownership of the Labour Party
My own barber, now working six days a week instead of five, because his mortgage has literally doubled, and unable to take his wife and two kids on a holiday – anywhere – since 2019.
In the same edition of your paper, pollsters predict a record Labour majority. But what will that mean for the hungry and deprived? For those on basement-level benefits, or the lowest state pensions in Europe, or the working poor (who comprise the majority of people in poverty)? What will change?
Absolutely nothing! It will be a changing of the guard, not a change of system; a respray of Toryism in palest Labour pink.
One of the many things Sir Keir Starmer and millionaire Anas Sarwar’s Labour refuse to do with their likely majority is tackle poverty pay. They point-blank refuse to implement the demand of the entire trade union movement – a demand pioneered by the Scottish Socialist Party – for a guaranteed £15-an-hour national minimum wage.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar's claim GB Energy will bring down bills must be challenged
They also refuse to abolish the age wage discrimination of the multiple lower youth rates of minimum wages.
This one measure, £15 per hour minimum for all workers aged 16 and over, would lift millions out of poverty, deep poverty, or the perilous state of 280,000 Scots who are a mere £40 a week away from being in poverty.
I make this challenge to Anas Sarwar: would he be prepared to introduce this decent level of guaranteed minimum wage, and compel his own family firm to pay it to their workers, given that until recently they didn’t even pay all of them the misnamed “real living wage” of £12 an hour?
Furthermore, is Anas Sarwar prepared to admit, publicly, that ALL zero-hours contracts are exploitative, and should therefore all be abolished?
READ MORE: New analysis proves Labour WILL impose austerity in power, SNP say
Is he willing to commit Labour to implementing the policy I devised, proposed and won unanimous support for at the 2018 annual conference of my own union, USDAW, for an outright ban on all zero-hours contracts and their replacement by a guaranteed minimum 16-hour contract for every worker who wants one? Will he and Labour implement the policy I subsequently proposed, and which was agreed unopposed, at the 2019 STUC congress?
Is he going to drop his use of the weasel words about Labour scrapping “exploitative zero-hours contracts”, when they are all exploitative, with his verbal deception trying to camouflage Labour’s intention of keeping many workers chained in this modern form of slavery?
I await Anas Sarwar’s response with little hope of a reassuring reply.
Richie Venton
via email
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here