IN the face of rising costs and economic uncertainty, the SNP have stepped up to help Scotland’s communities. In contrast, the Westminster parties are offering very little to help people now and in the future.
I was especially delighted to hear First Minister John Swinney outline his plans for a social tariff for energy, broadband and mobile bills. The policy would support those on low incomes and disabled and elderly people and ensure that no-one in Scotland goes without those essentials.
Funded through a mix of general taxation and by skimming the excess profits of energy companies, it is sensible, pragmatic and one that will make a tangible difference to our communities.
READ MORE: SNP manifesto to focus on NHS with plan to 'end Westminster cuts'
This was something I supported in the previous parliament and one that I know would do a world of good for people in Stirling and Strathallan, as well as the rest of Scotland.
Scotland is blessed with an abundance of natural energy resources yet under Westminster we are faced with some of the highest energy costs. The UK’s energy market is demonstrably broken and none of the Westminster parties has a plan to drive down energy costs for families across Stirling and Strathallan.
That such a policy needs to be brought through the House of Commons only serves to reinforce our case for why Scotland needs independence. If we had full control over energy and telecommunications, our Parliament at Holyrood could have introduced this well before the election was called.
As it stands, it has been the SNP making the case for Scotland at Westminster for the merits of this policy, something that the Tories, Labour or the LibDems are willing to do.
I would hope a Labour government might be more open to the idea of a social tariff than a hard-right conservative one, but the only way this necessary policy will even be heard is if there is SNP representation advocating for Scotland’s needs.
A similar point could be made about EU membership. We all know that Brexit has been a bad idea implemented terribly. The UK is out and the only realistic route for Scotland to get back in anytime soon is through the SNP and independence.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens manifesto will call for 'independent Scottish republic'
Staggeringly, even though we are the most pro-EU party in Scotland, one pro-EU site which provides guidance on tactical voting has largely backed Labour in Scotland despite Starmer excluding even single market membership for the UK.
With myriad similar websites popping up all over the place, and taking into account the broken nature of the UK’s first-past-the-post electoral system, the questions that matter for those in the pro-independence camp are:
- Who is best placed to move the dial towards Scottish independence?
- Who will be the most effective advocate for Scotland’s interests in the next Westminster parliament?
I am standing for the SNP in Stirling and Strathallan because I believe that we can be the answer to those questions.
The SNP are offering a radical change, yes, but one where we know that Scotland’s best future lies back in the EU, not drifting aimlessly in the Atlantic with the rest of the UK.
In contrast, all that the Westminster parties can offer is more austerity, more cuts to public services and more misery for our communities.
We can and must do better.
Scotland has fantastic resources at its disposal. We have a well-educated, innovative and resourceful population. We want to be part of the world, not cut off from it.
The SNP have a positive vision to share that Scotland can do better than the Westminster status quo and it’s one that I believe is resonating with our communities across our nation.
On July 4, vote SNP to put the powers back into Scotland’s hands.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel