THERE should be no surprise about Labour candidates doing little campaigning to let Tory candidates have a clear run in constituencies which the SNP currently hold.
The surprise deselection of their candidate in Aberdeen North and Moray East for comments he apparently made years ago – and didn’t result in him being pulled from previous elections – is simply Labour allowing Douglas Ross that.
It shouldn’t be surprising that there are back-room deals between the Unionist parties – especially the Tories and Labour who practically share the same manifesto commitments. If you were told a political party was backing bankers, lining up business support but refusing to remove the two-child cap on benefits – you would automatically assume this was the Tories.
But it’s Starmer’s Labour Party that has cosied up to the bankers again, no doubt planning PFI 2 to steal more public funds for the enrichment of the private sector! Labour can’t be trusted to do anything differently from the Tories. Maybe it’s about time they just became the one political party.
Councillor Kenny MacLaren
Paisley
THE Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) is to be applauded for tackling the elephant in the room in this General Election campaign – the stark choices whoever is elected will have to make in relation to the public finances.
We in the UK are experiencing the highest level of debt for more than 60 years, the tax burden is at a record high and public services are struggling. While the Government is paying huge interest on this debt, and welfare bills have grown; spending on health is likely to increase because of an ageing population, with the funding of defence also set to rise.
The solution to deliver increased investment and higher economic growth is a pipe dream in at least the short to medium term.
Taxes will therefore have to rise – despite a commitment by the main political parties not to raise VAT, National Insurance or income tax – or cuts will have to be made in public services. The alternative is to borrow more and see debt continue to escalate.
The main political parties must end this conspiracy of silence and be honest with the public as to what is in store further down the line. However, I would urge the voters not to hold their breath on this happening.
Alex Orr
Edinburgh
ALL we hear about in Scotland is the supposed waste of money regarding the ferries, but ferries and everything else pale into insignificance when put against the PPE procurement scandals.
As the BBC reported this week, about £1.4bn worth of PPE was destroyed or written off from a single contract. The owners of the firm were said to have bought a £30m seafront villa in Barbados, a yacht, a £6m house in south of England and an international equestrian centre in Bedfordshire.
It is now four years since the first lockdown and the Department of Health continues to store and dispose of billions of items of PPE at a cost of millions every week.
The Government’s panic to procure PPE opened doors for opportunists and middlemen in unrelated industries to make extortionate margins of profit. Wes Streeting has said the money lost could have paid for 37,000 nurses.
This is only one example of monies wasted by a Tory Westminster government – we also have HS2, battleships that don’t get past the Isle of Wight, tanks we are still waiting for etc etc.
Here in Scotland let’s not forget PFI and the millions this costs councils and health services every year. Thanks Labour for that – still paying for that 17 years later. But “what about the ferries?” is the lament we hear.
Winifred McCartney
Paisley
DOES the complaining of those embroiled in the election betting scandal at being named sound like howling hypocrisy to you?
There are significant comparisons we must make, the most obvious being the ongoing slower-than-snail’s pace, ultra-publicised investigation into the SNP finances, which seems to resurface in the press any time the party seems to be having a good week. If you’re a Scottish SNP politician, it’s murder investigation-style police tents on the lawn but no comment we’re busy if you’re a Tory.
Coupled with the decade-long platforming of the fascist Farage – a man who is on his eighth attempt to wrangle a seat in Parliament and whose private company is profiting from all the free publicity given him by the British press – there are serious questions that need to be asked about the state of UK democracy when the mainstream/legacy media seem uninterested in basic investigative impartiality.
Amanda Baker
Edinburgh
VOTE Labour if ...
1) You are a true English patriot;
2) You don’t want to be in the EU;
3) You want privatisation of the NHS;
4) You don’t want Waspi women to get what they are due;
5) You want nuclear power stations in Scotland (and the associated nuclear waste);
6) You want to keep Trident in Scotland;
7) You want Scottish students to pay for their education;
8) You want the bedroom tax;
9) You want to keep anti-trade union legislation
10) You want an end to free prescriptions, free bus travel etc
11) You want Scottish energy to be controlled by London;
12) You don’t want Scotland to run its own affairs;
Yes, vote Labour, the “True party of English Patriotism”.
Kerr Walker
Alford
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel