CORRESPONDENT Pat O’Neill (Letters, Jul 2) reckons Alex Salmond’s biggest mistake was saying before the vote that the referendum in 2014 was “once-in-a-lifetime”, and that statement somehow tied Nicola Sturgeon and gave her opponents a big stick to beat her with. This is not just inaccurate nonsense but panders to the drivel we hear constantly from Unionists.
First, if it did become a big stick it was only because Sturgeon, true to form, failed to refute it vociferously. The SNP could have dealt with this from the outset, and for an indy-ambitious party it would have been easy to do.
READ MORE: Gordon Brown sparks SNP anger with General Election intervention
Second, Salmond was referring to the retrospective, and indeed it was an unusual circumstance in our lifetimes past. However, we allegedly live in a democracy where future generations cannot possibly be bound by the actions of predecessors. We get things wrong, then our parliament is designed to rectify matters with subsequent legislation. Indeed, this particularly applies to errors like Brexit, where polls suggest that those who opposed it in 2016 have been joined by Brexiteers who have come to see just how pernicious it has been to our economy and our pockets, and it is clearly time to exercise our democratic to rectify this appalling political error.
Of course, if the predicted electoral dictatorship does arrive with a Labour sweeping majority then Scotland will be cemented into a Brexit status we neither voted for nor can do anything about without independence.
Third, if Sturgeon and the SNP considered that Salmond’s statement hindered the drive for indy, it can only be that their agenda was to allow it to; it was an excuse, not a reason. During Sturgeon’s leadership of the party, in a period where it was given six strong mandates for indy, the SNP slithered and dithered, with the astonishing craft and guile of a goalie deliberately trying to throw the game.
READ MORE: John Swinney hits out as Rishi Sunak 'dismisses' disenfranchised Scots
There was the Section 30 order request to newly elected Johnson in December 2019. This was made when we knew he would reject it and not only did Sturgeon not refute his ridiculously childish “reasons”, the request had not been made with even a follow-up. It was a speculative punt rather than the start of a serious campaign.
The Supreme Court debacle was a project doomed to failure. It was predicated on completely the wrong premise, another punt without a campaign to back it up.
Then there’s the complete failure, even during this campaign, to drive home to undecided Scots that the reason for the Unionist claimed “failures” such as strictures in the NHS, drug abuse, education, income tax variation, the delay in dualling the A9 and all the other “failures” attacked by political opponents, is the simple truth that as we have seen historically, and can expect under imposed Labour government in the UK union, all these policy concerns can never be resolved without full political and fiscal independence and the financial latitude self-governance brings. Rather, some Scots falsely view red-tory Labour as the “solution” and not indy – St Andrew, help us.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland: John Swinney tells Kaye Adams to stop interrupting
We are being seduced by the mainstream media, backing our impending red-tory Labour government because they know their real Tory friends have blown it and need rested, and Scots are potentially about to make a huge mistake thinking things are going to change with Labour.
Voting Labour in Scotland will only change the colour of the rosettes imposing Tory mantra and austerity on us.
Salmond and his colleagues are showing the indy direction. Alba is a young party, probably too new for this election. But Westminster elections are irrelevant anyway, other than for those who wish to prop up the illusion of democracy and keep Scotland under the Westminster thumb and ensure UK access to our rich resources.
Let’s not blame Salmond for Scotland’s squandering of six solid mandates for indy. Let’s put the responsibility for that directly where it belongs, learn from it, galvanise the wider movement to control the campaign and drive our politicians, and take the action to ensure that 2026 is the de facto referendum to finally lead Scotland back to the promised land of three centuries ago, and with a resolve never to allow any vested clique to sell our nation’s birth right ever again.
Jim Taylor
Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel