One of the key matters clients have been asking since the General Election results from Scotland filtered in, is what the impact of this will have on the May 2026 Scottish Parliamentary elections, and if it is inevitable that Anas Sarwar will be marching into Bute House. So, a few reflections.
No bones about it, the SNP had a catastrophic election night, collapsing from the 48 MPs secured in 2019 to just 9 MPs, while Labour increased from its one MP north of the border to 37. Scotland’s Central Belt was turned from yellow to red, as seat after seat toppled to the “Starmer tsunami”.
However, despite Labour achieving more than four times the number of seats, this was on a meagre 5.3 per cent more of the vote when compared with the SNP – 35.3 percent for Labour versus 30.0 per cent for the SNP. Such are the vagaries of our first past-the-post voting system, which needs urgent reform, but I suspect no time soon.
Support for the SNP fell by 15 per cent from its 2019 election showing, with the vast bulk of these voters going to Labour, which saw a 16.7 per cent upswing in backing. Many of these voters, however, still support independence, which hovers at just under 50 per cent and is not going away.
READ MORE: 'Very tough time': John Swinney says sorry to SNP candidates who lost their seats
It is vital that there is a period of reflection by the SNP, with First Minister John Swinney indeed highlighting the need to “take stock”, and this including the issue of independence.
There is a clear and urgent need to refocus on economic growth and improving public services, seen by most of the Scottish populace as underperforming. In fairness, as new First Minister, Mr Swinney had already begun this process before the election was called.
His clear challenge is how to balance an activist base hungry to promote the independence message, with a public who in a cost-of-living crisis do not currently see the constitutional question as a key priority, or indeed it should be added thorny issues such as gender identity. How the issue of independence can be made relevant in addressing these issues will be crucial if the party is to deliver victory at elections to Holyrood, which are less than two years away.
This time is however a blessing in disguise, giving the SNP the opportunity to get its act together for 2026, at a time when the sheen will undoubtedly be coming off Sir Keir Starmer’s premiership. Operation Branchform, the investigation into the misuse of SNP funds, which has been dragging on for some time now, should also hopefully be resolved, in whatever manner.
This was also, it must be remembered, very much an election in which voting for Labour was positioned as the conduit to get rid of a Tory Government, a cry of anguish. Labour’s UK vote share ultimately increased by less than two per cent on 2019, while the Tories saw their vote share half.
It was therefore more a rejection of a Tory government which had been in power for more than a decade, enveloped in scandal, than an endorsement of Sir Keir Starmer’s party, whose landslide is fragile.
The UK remains mired in economic doldrums, with a weak economy and low growth. Given the tight public finances, and the maintenance of Conservative fiscal framework by Labour, the “change” promised is unlikely to materialize to a level desired by the public, leading to inevitable disillusionment. Labour, holding the keys of power at a UK level, will no longer be able to blame the Tories.
This clearly has the potential to play into SNP hands, as will potential divisions between the Labour Party north and south of the border, with the part south of the border ultimately holding the whip hand.
We boast a sophisticated electorate, who can differentiate between elections to different legislatures. It has shown that it is volatile, and is happy to switch and switch again, which may mean the swing to Labour may not be a longer-term trend. There is all to play for.
So, while the SNP may be down, it is by no means out, and it has just under two years to recover credibility and support.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel