CORRESPONDENT Joey Vimsante stating that if branch offices split from their UK parties Scots will never have a voice in Westminster, and that we did not benefit from Scotland being represented almost totally by SNP MPs there, meaning our voice was not heard in the UK parties, is so wrong on so many counts it suggests that this had to be crafted by a Unionist (Letters, July 14).
We’ve had more than 300 years of Westminster control. When has Westminster ever listened to any of the thousands of MPs we’ve sent there? What palpable difference has any Scottish MP ever made in that place, other than to perpetuate a Union that Scots never voted for and, because we allow it to, denies us the process to leave it?
We have never had a voice in Westminster; the reality being that electing an enshrined minority voice serves little purpose other than perpetuating the illusion of democracy, a convenient method of obscuring democracy itself and the rights and aspirations of an increasingly divergent colony struggling to shake off the restrictions of a colonial master that has too much to lose by relenting to the democratic necessity of Scots taking control of their own governance to satisfy their different aspirations for those who live, work and pay their taxes here.
The branch offices of the major parties have contributed nothing to reflect Scotland’s diverse needs. Indeed, with the exploitation of our fossil fuel and other resources it is clear their function has been to enable the transfer of Scotland’s wealth to the UK, rather than harvest the benefits for the Scots they claim to represent.
Those like Joey Vimsante need to realise the salient truth that Scotland is a colony. Our representation in Westminster is designed to ensure we remain so. The purpose of the Scottish branch offices of the major UK parties is to deliver compliance with our colony status.
Another reality is surely that it doesn’t matter how many MPs we send to Westminster. It is a sop to democracy. But only as long as we accept it.
Yet, Scotland is a colony with a unique situation. We are told we are in a partnership within this UK. We’re given a “seat at the table”, just ignored to render it useless. However this does afford us an opportunity not enjoyed by those like America, India, Rhodesia and all the other colonies that struck out for freedom from English control. And that is a public theatre of conflict at the heart of UK Government to drive home our claim of right to independence. For some inexplicable reason our supposed independence-supporting politicians have failed/refused to utilise this political gift to drive home our aspirations.
It wouldn’t matter whether we elect any of Vimsante’s parties to Westminster. They will never truly represent Scotland’s interests – never represent ordinary folks. They are inured in the Union, that is the master they serve.
My hope is that when independence is won (because of political failures and political dilly dallying it seems unlikely I will live long enough to see it) the Scottish political parties will rediscover their mantra within the context of an independent Scotland and work to deliver here in Scotland their vision of where we should be, and Scots can make their choice of political direction.
After more than 300 years of political failure to Scots, we have to realise that Vimsante’s faith in UK Unionist parties ever having a Damascene moment over the rights of Scots, or enjoying any influence over Scotland’s rights within this iniquitous UK Union is at best fatuous, in reality futile.
Their link with their Unionist masters absolutely needs to be broken.
Jim Taylor
Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here