THE Labour Party of Sir Keir Starmer will not prioritise fundamental reform of the House of Lords but will introduce an English Devolution Bill. The latter should not be interpreted as a first step on the road to federalism, as proposed by Gordon Brown. It is an attempt to appear, at least superficially, to be working more closely with local government in devolving more financial responsibility.
If “Sir Keir” had seriously considered Mr Brown’s proposals and if he was serious about engaging more positively and respectfully with the Scottish Government, then one of his 40 bills to be introduced in the UK Parliament should have provided for the repeal of the UK Internal Market Act with the Sewel Convention put on a statutory footing, as agreed by all five of the Scottish political parties participating in the Smith Commission.
READ MORE: SNP ask 'Why not Scotland?' as UK hosts European nation leaders at EPC
With the UK economy stagnant and devolution on its knees, “Sir Keir”, supported by fewer than one in five of the electorate, has less than two years to demonstrate that Scottish devolution and “the Union” are worth sustaining. Failure to implement the Sewel recommendation of the Smith Commission will simply demonstrate that “Sir Keir” is a man of meaningless words and that his party (including the patronising chief and deputy-chief of the Scottish branch office) has nothing substantial to offer the people of Scotland.
Those who truly believe in democracy, as well as those convinced the majority of the people of Scotland do not wish independence, should welcome either a second referendum (a seven-year interval has been deemed sufficient for the people of Northern Ireland, so should also be sufficient for the people of Scotland) or a de facto referendum in 2026.
READ MORE: Labour have once again broken their promises on House of Lords reform
In the meantime, while taking time to reflect and learning from mistakes made is critically important, there is no substitute for each individual who supports independence (whether an SNP member or not) seeking ways, apart from any political party allegiances, to more positively contribute to raising sustained support above 60%. The launch of a “Citizen’s Convention” this year to determine a realistic legal route to self-determination would be a significant step in achieving this goal and in Scotland regaining its independence.
Stan Grodynski
Longniddry, East Lothian
ALEX Beckett asks “is this the ‘change’ we were promised?” in his letter printed alongside the photo of Lammy and Netanyahu shaking hands.
Surely he realises that this was a smiling Netanyahu having been reassured that the new UK Government will continue to follow Israel’s lead in Middle East affairs as before.
So much for the promised changes with a new government, for, as with social and economic policies, the only changes are in personnel. New faces, same policies. The Westminster consensus continues regardless of party or personnel in government. The UK establishment rules.
Drew Reid
Falkirk
VICEROY Murray is “rolling up his sleeves”, but not to help Scotland. The speech delivered by an English King dripping in diamonds offered Scotland nothing.
GB Energy and the National Wealth Fund are private equity heists designed to funnel money to the City of London, the world’s dirty-money-laundering capital. GB Energy will shovel Scotland’s North Sea oil revenues into Westminster’s yawning maw. It won’t lower prices or create jobs. Only renationalising energy and introducing regional electricity pricing would. The UK has the only fully privatised energy sector in Europe and the highest prices (ditto for water, apart from Scotland, and rail).
But English Labour won’t do this because then Scots would pay the lowest electricity prices in Europe, and the Viceroy can’t have that!
READ MORE: Minister blames 'economic circumstances' for failure to ditch two-child cap
English Labour’s real priorities lie elsewhere. Starmer flew to Washington, promising the UK would ratchet up defence spending to 2.5% of GDP (£8bn more by 2030), appeasing the baying wolves in the military industrial complex. Foreign Secretary Lammy flew to Tel Aviv to schmooze with war criminal Netanyahu, pledging further support for genocide.
Most heinous of all, English Labour won’t lift a finger to help 4.2 million children living in poverty. It’s creating a task force to kick this uncomfortable can down the road rather than spend the money to lift these kids out of misery. Ending the two-child benefit cap would cost just £1.7 billion. Cabinet minister Pat McFadden even claimed it was “up for debate” whether child poverty was harmful. So, Scotland must continue to mitigate from its limited-by-Westminster budget, taking money from the NHS.
The way out of this neoliberal nightmare is to end this 317-year-old faux union and once again govern ourselves.
Leah Gunn Barrett
Edinburgh
I HAVE never written to this letters page before but I honestly cannot believe the tone of the letters criticising the recent front page of The National for urging a Spanish win in the Euro final.
Let’s be honest here, there’s a reason why practically every right-thinking Scottish person was praying for a Spanish win: if England had won we would have had that win talked about on every English news outlet and stuffed down our throats for the next 20 years.
READ MORE: Front page did not reflect our inclusive and mature Yes movement
That English exceptionalism that brought about Brexit would’ve been suffocating. There’s a reason why we joke about Scotland supporters’ first team being the Scotland team and their second choice being whoever is playing England. If we can’t joke about the big neighbour who has colonised Scotland for the last 300 years losing a football match, without a big squeamish outcry of “oh we mustn’t offend”, what hope is there of us ever demanding our independence?
John McCann
via email
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel