THE 2014 campaign began in 2012 for me. That summer, I accepted an invitation to speak at a pro-independence rally held round the bandstand in Princes Street Gardens.
What I said had a pretty immediate impact. The Edinburgh-based paper for which I had been writing regularly, the one of which I’d previously been the senior assistant editor, suddenly stopped responding to any of my communications.
It seemed a price worth paying. There was huge excitement in the air. We all felt we were in at the start of something big. We all felt that independence for Scotland might be just around the corner.
READ MORE: How artists and creators helped to shape the 2014 Yes campaign
When the campaign moved up a gear I went on tour with the Yesmobile, an elderly Beetle.
I covered a fair bit of Scotland in it in the company of Jean Urquhart, who became an SNP MSP for the Highlands where she’d been an SNP councillor and who, on the back of living there for a few weeks, latterly decided to make her home in Shetland.
We had nothing as grand as a mission statement; just a conviction that we had to speak to groups of people in their own habitat rather than trying for formal meetings. We knew, even then, that it was the doubters who had to be convinced.
We visited Arran and Islay in the West and Shetland (of course) in the north. Once, I remember, we ambushed folk in a sympathetic doctor’s surgery.
READ MORE: The Blue Book: 'Conspiracy theories' or Yes campaign's secret weapon?
Always, we talked about how a truly independent Scotland could transform all our lives. Maybe not immediately but certainly not too far down the line. We rented accommodation from farmers and anyone else who would have us.
My favourite was a little thatched cottage in Arran where my then dog could play footie in the garden.
Our wardrobes were what you might call the pocket variety. A series of Yes T-shirts laundered (by Jean!) en route with a few pairs of jeans and undies.
We arrived everywhere with Yes badges and pens and anything else we could lay our hands on to distribute at ad hoc meetings. I remember being able to deploy a Yes pen visibly on the newspaper review on The Andrew Marr Show.
I had also hoped to join the bus tour already doing a much more ambitious 16-stop epic in the spring of 2014 but the dates never worked out. The Listening Lugs bus was originally born in 1997 thanks to Willie McIlvanney.
Its successor tour included such luminaries as Neal Ascherson, James Robertson, Karine Polwart and Billy Kay. The fact of so many prominent members of the cultural community putting their time where their mouth was entirely emblematic of the run-up to the poll.
When I read how supposedly divisive it all was, I wonder if the critics suffered from false memory syndrome.
Outside of two kenspeckle figures, pretty well the whole artistic community in Scotland became energised. 2014 became a giant party for the Yes community.
It was the best of times, and only became the worst of times when the reality dawned that the vote had been lost.
But an enthusiastic strategic campaign had seen the pro-independence vote rise by almost 20%. Who could forget the panic-stricken surge north by so many Westminster parliamentarians a week earlier when Yes was briefly ahead?
Had I located the genius who went up and down their ranks with a loudspeaker on his rickshaw which advised us all “your imperial masters are here” I would have kissed him whether he fancied that fate or not!
And yet here we are, a long 10 years on, with the principal architect of some of the dafter Better Together scare stories now sitting in Westminster as a Labour MP.
You couldn’t make it up – and sadly I don’t have to!
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here