WITH more than half of the UK’s wealth tied up in land and property, the way we tax land affects not only who owns it but also how that wealth benefits the broader economy.

As public finances come under strain under increased pressures, there are calls to revisit how we tax land, including whether land value taxation (LVT) could replace Council Tax as a more effective, fair and productive approach.

LVT has long been proposed as an effective way to tax. It is seen as fair because the value of land is significantly socially created by public investments, policy and regulation. It is seen as economically effective because it doesn’t disincentivise productive activity, and also has the advantage of being hard to avoid.

READ MORE: Watch our live council tax discussion with Common Weal's Craig Dalzell

However, while the theory for LVT is compelling, introducing it in practice has proved more challenging. Our research found it has been tried in 33 countries, often in conjunction with other property taxes, and this experience offers useful learning. Internationally, successful LVT systems rely on sustained public support and political consensus. When these elements are missing, efforts to introduce LVT often don’t last long.

Introducing a single land value tax to replace several existing taxes, however strong the theory, is unlikely to be practical in one step and the basic building blocks are not currently in place to make it workable. There is though, a strong case to reform annual land and property tax and change existing taxes to better tax land value.

The case for Council Tax reform is well articulated, with the current charges now only loosely tied to property values and set within a framework that has remained largely unchanged since 1991. Several approaches to reform have been put forward and these need not wait for wider land value tax reforms.

A broader approach to reforming annual land and property taxation would involve non-domestic rates. Reforms here could introduce a split of value between the underlying land value and the value of the built property. Moving in this direction could allow tax to better reflect where value really lies, without being a disincentive to making improvements to property.

A reformed system of annual land and property tax would also open up the opportunity to replace Land and Buildings Transaction Tax, a reform recommended by several UK government reviews given it is seen to be a disincentive to moving house, constraining productive economic activity.

READ MORE: Lack of local tax reform 'one of Holyrood's biggest failures'

Making reforms to better tax land value requires groundwork. Foundation steps include completing a comprehensive land register and developing a cadastral system to bring together data on land ownership, use, and value.

A phased programme to bring all land on to the valuation roll would open up the future options for government to reform and improve annual taxation of land and property.

At the Scottish Land Commission, we are currently refreshing our advice to ministers on land and tax policy, ahead of the Scottish Government’s tax strategy.

Our advice emphasises the value in creating a route map for phased reform that sets a clear direction of travel and a step-by-step approach. Around that we could then build the collective engagement, understanding, clarity and consensus that any successful and lasting land tax reforms will require.

Hamish Trench is chief executive and accountable officer of the Scottish Land Commission. He is a former chartered surveyor with experience of land policy, management and research in the public and private sectors.

His previous roles include director posts at the Cairngorms National Park Authority and Deer Commission for Scotland, and working for a national firm of property consultants. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts (RSA).