IN my constituency of Aberdeenshire North and Moray East, communities are facing temperatures of up to -6 this week, with yellow warnings for snow and ice.
There will be many households having to make the impossible choice between heating their homes or eating – unable to provide warm, nutritious meals as a result.
Some of them will go without so their children can eat and stay warm, others will access one of the many local food banks that have sprung up across the country providing an essential service and support to those in need.
READ MORE: 'What a chancer': Anas Sarwar slammed over Winter Fuel Payment U-turn
Unemployment, a sudden reduction in benefits or an unexpected bill when household budgets are already stretched thin are some of the reasons that someone may need help from their local food bank.
Many of my constituents will be turning to food banks such as the Aberdeenshire North food bank, based in Peterhead and Fraserburgh, which distributed 10,000 food parcels last year as part of the Trussell Trust network.
This food bank, like so many others, is run by an incredible team of volunteers who give not just their time and effort to help people but provide a powerful sense of community and support to those marginalised and isolated by poverty and food insecurity.
The Aberdeenshire North Foodbank, in partnership with the charity Stella’s Voice, also operates the Peterhead Community Market Garden – a community food growing space which is open for all to enjoy. It aims to provide healthy produce, build confidence and provide valuable training opportunities.
It is incredible to see the grassroots enthusiasm for the impact that this project is having and I hope to see it go from strength to strength in the coming years.
Before 2010 food banks were few and far between. Fourteen years later they are very much a part of our society, with the Trussell Trust distributing 3.12 million emergency food parcels in 2023/24, representing a shocking 94% increase from just five years earlier, with 1.1 million of these parcels distributed for children.
READ MORE: Glaswegians give their views on Rachel Reeves 'lying on her CV'
These figures are appalling and should be raising alarm bells in the corridors of Westminster. This is why I arranged my “eliminating the use of food banks” debate this week, to highlight how policymakers can bring about a reduction in the need for foodbanks, through a progressive, socially just and joined-up approach to policy making.
At Holyrood, the Scottish Government has already introduced a raft of policies which have contributed to a reduction in food poverty such as free school meals and the Scottish Child Payment, described as a “game changer” by leading charities.
The Best Start Grant package, for example, which helps parents and carers on low incomes with the costs of having a child, can help significantly by providing households with some financial breathing space and with it, the ability to dedicate more money to buying healthy food.
I believe Holyrood is also considering how a social tariff for the most vulnerable (to pay less on energy bills) could be introduced, which would be transformative in terms of tackling poverty and would help stop people having to make the invidious choice between heating and eating.
Meanwhile, the Trussell Trust and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation continue to advocate for an “essentials guarantee” to ensure that social security payments should never fall below the amount needed to afford essentials such as food and household bills. They estimate this to cost around £120 per week.
With the basic rate of Universal Credit at £91 per week, there is currently a gap of £29 there – a discrepancy the Chancellor should be looking to deal with ahead of her next Budget.
A more robust social safety net such as implementing a statutory living wage and dismantling catastrophic austerity measures brought in by the Tories should be another focus for this new Labour Government.
After all, back in 2019, the UN’s special rapporteur for extreme poverty, Philip Alston, described austerity as causing “the systematic immiseration” of the British population and creating “19th-century workhouse” conditions.
If Labour’s pledge to bring “change” means anything, surely this is a good place to start as things have only got worse since Mr Alston made his devastating assessment.
READ MORE: By-election candidates call out Anas Sarwar over 'convenient' winter fuel U-turn
The upcoming review into Universal Credit is another golden opportunity to make good on Labour’s manifesto commitments.
Taking a leaf out of the Scottish Government’s book and rolling out free school meals and access to food during school breaks would be a step in the right direction as well as empowering local communities with “dignified” food aid models moving beyond the traditional charity style approach.
Affordable food clubs, social supermarkets and community kitchens would also address isolation and bolster community strength.
Given the staggering levels of hardship and hunger facing so many across the UK, something has got to give. Starmer can talk about growth all he likes, but genuine and sustainable growth comes in large part from lifting everyone up and helping people to reach their full potential.
How exactly can we expect children to flourish when families are skipping meals and living in destitution, unable to meet the costs of meeting life’s basic needs, and risking further embedding cross-generational poverty and diminishing people’s life chances?
Our ultimate goal should be a society where food banks are obsolete, replaced by robust social and economic structures that guarantee access to nutritious and affordable food.
I intend to make sure the UK Government is listening to what is being done in Scotland, not least because “change” needs to be something far more tangible than just a vacuous election slogan for the Labour Party.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel