STAGING a cup semi-final or final between Celtic and Rangers at Hampden has long presented serious security issues for Police Scotland, the clubs, stewards and tournament organisers. What would happen, then, if the crowd for the Old Firm game was increased by almost 20,000 and moved nearly 50 miles away to BT Murrayfield in Edinburgh?
The 67,144-capacity stadium – the largest in Scotland – has certainly proved it can host major football games in the past decade with Barcelona, Hearts, Hibernian and Celtic all playing there during that time. But would the Old Firm match, one of the most intense and notorious derbies in world football, really pass off without major incident if it was played on the other side of the country for the first time in over a century?
These are questions which senior Scottish Football Association officials, who are currently deliberating whether to stay at or leave Hampden when their current lease expires in 2020, will have to consider in the coming weeks.
The SFA are concerned at the high cost of maintaining and running a ground which is owned by amateur club Queens Park – particularly with business rates poised to increase by £350,000 due to a government revaluation. They are discussing following the lead of major footballing nations like Germany, Italy and Spain and taking Scotland internationals and cup semi-finals and finals to various stadiums around the country – including Murrayfield.
Dominic McKay, the Scottish Rugby Union chief operating officer, is confident the capital venue would be able to deal with a Betfred Cup or William Hill Scottish Cup clash between the Glasgow clubs Celtic and Rangers. “It would create a very special atmosphere,” he said before the Scotland rugby team took on Samoa in front of a sell-out crowd at Murrayfield on Saturday. “I think it would create an atmosphere which could, in a neutral city, be quite interesting, quite positive.
“From our point of view, we believe we’ve got a very special stadium. We’ve hosted European Cup finals here, we’ve hosted outstanding rugby matches, but we’ve also hosted football games here regularly.
“So we know we can do it, we know we can put on a great show. The city is an outstanding backdrop, the transport is pretty good. We’re always in the market for major events and the conversation with the guys at the SFA has led us to put our best foot forward.”
Hearts are currently playing their home games at Murrayfield while Tynecastle is being redeveloped and they have had crowds of 24,248 and 32,852 for their meetings with Aberdeen and Rangers respectively.
McKay, whose organisation has pitched to their SFA counterparts for the right to hold showpiece football matches in future, believes that proves they can deal with whatever demands arise.
“We had the largest travelling Rangers support since Manchester just a couple of weeks ago when Hearts played,” he said. “There were 15,000 Rangers supporters in here.
“We’ve got an outstanding relationship with Edinburgh City Council and with the police in Scotland. But, of course, we’d learn from the experience at Hampden, we’d learn from the experience at Celtic Park or Ibrox and we we’d make sure we put on the world-class event we always put on.”
“We’ve certainly spent a lot of time as part of our bid preparation highlighting how we would manage those big football internationals, but also those big football cup finals that might or might not come out of Hampden,” he said. “We would leave no stone unturned to ensure the spectators from both sides have a great experience.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here