DEREK McInnes insisted last night that referee Euan Anderson wrongly sent off Sam Cosgrove for a “brilliant tackle” on Kris Ajer during Celtic’s Ladbrokes Premiership win at Parkhead – and claimed opposite number Neil Lennon agreed it wasn’t a red card.
Celtic had just re-established their lead at 2-1 when the big English striker ran 20 yards to slide in on Ajer, winning the ball in a manner which referee Anderson felt was endangering his opponent. McInnes, on the other hand, accused Ajer of gamesmanship and said the sending off gave them a mountain to climb to get a result.
“The ref had a good game but it’s a poor decision,” said McInnes. “People have already put it in the same bracket as Ryan Porteous’ tackle but it’s nothing like it. Porteous clearly made contact with the player. I’ve watched Sam’s 50 times and he’s won the ball cleanly.
“If he goes in at speed and hits the player, you can understand the sending off,” he added. “You have to make sure you get the ball and 100 per cent, it’s a brilliant tackle. He probably doesn’t need to go in as quick but he gets it cleanly.
“If Sam hits Ajer at that speed, Ajer’s hurt. And he’s clearly not hurt. Big Ajer was laughing and winking at him lying on the ground. There was nothing wrong with the boy, he carried on.
“Did the reaction of Celtic’s players influence the ref’s decision? Who knows. But I’ve just spoken to Lenny and the first thing he said to me was that, no way was it a red card. Even he thinks we’ve been harshly treated there.
“I’m not saying it would have changed the result but it certainly gives us a better chance if Cosgrove stays on the pitch. VAR could have helped us but you still need the ref to make the right decision. He thinks Sam led with his leg and caught the player as well. But he hasn’t.”
Lennon left his media duties to assistant John Kennedy. “I don’t think he fully catches him, he just nicks him,” says Kennedy. “But in the modern game when you fly in at that speed, and there is a form of recklessness about it, you give the ref a decision to make and in his eyes it was a red card.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel