IS Scotland having an outbreak of affection for this England team at the European Championships? Do we need to see our GPs about this?
“What seems to be the problem?”
“I think I might want England to win this thing, doctor.”
“Are you experiencing any discomfort or other troubling symptoms?”
“I cheered when Harry Kane scored the opener against Ukraine and I almost tweeted congratulations to Gareth Southgate afterwards.”
“I’m going to prescribe the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph. Take one of each every day for the next week – preferably before you’ve eaten – and you should see the symptoms recede.”
England are proficient at finding exciting new ways of exiting major football tournaments. They blow two-goal leads; they have players sent off for acts of gross stupidity and they can’t seem to find the net from 12 yards with only the goalkeeper standing in the way.
READ MORE: 'British' royals snub Scottish and Welsh national football teams
Smaller and much less fancied nations such as Sweden, Iceland and Ireland feed off the hubris and entitlement that swirl around England like Saturn’s rings and use them to administer a right good spanking.
Tonight only Denmark stand between England and their first major final since 1966. I say “only Denmark” which is perhaps proof in itself of what can happen if you pay too much attention to English football journalists.
Denmark have actually won this tournament, and in the years that have elapsed since 1966 have produced several teams that have been classier and more elegant than anything England – with its far greater resources – have been able to fashion. The Danes, inspired by the distressing loss of their star player Christian Eriksen (below), have blossomed into a very fine team as this tournament has progressed.
In the last 55 years, 13 other European nations have reached the final of a proper football tournament. England haven’t. But they won’t have a better chance than this year. In front of 60,000 of their own supporters at Wembley, they should beat Denmark and take their place in the final.
England have a good, young, vibrant team bristling with players who may reasonably be termed “world-class”. Certainly, they’ve had good teams in the past, but this one – unlike their forebears – do not seem burdened with a propensity to believe their own hype. This owes much to their coach, Gareth Southgate, a man whose every utterance is a rebuke to the braying spirit of Brexit that has come to possess England.
READ MORE: WATCH: Ian Blackford trolls Boris Johnson with jibe about England football team
Southgate talks about hard work and respect and is never boastful. He never disdains his opponents and remains calm under the adolescent inquiries that come at him regularly from the English press. He praised Scotland for their performance in our 0-0 victory over them at Wembley. You would buy this man a drink and genuinely want good things for him.
No other England coach has ever elicited such feelings. Well, maybe Terry Venables, who always seemed like one of those friendly London cab drivers who would direct you to the Dog and Duck and tell you to say that Tel had sent you, and that this would automatically entitle you to a free pint.
Sometimes you felt sorry for those foreign coaches England have hired in desperation. There was one facial expression they all came to share: this was when it dawned on them that the players were not as remotely good as they’d thought and that they must find a way of concealing this from the press before they could take the money and flee.
More importantly, Southgate seems to have imbued his young charges with his values as a human being. Perhaps that’s unfair on players like Marcus Rashford (above) and Raheem Sterling, who have long exhibited grace under pressure and abuse. Sterling has spoken with heartfelt eloquence about racism in English and European football, while Rashford has used his fame to highlight the inequality faced by disadvantaged communities in his campaign for free school meals. He has landed more blows on Boris Johnson’s seedy government than Sir Keir Starmer.
Social media has also highlighted how few of this multi-racial, multi-cultural England team would have come to represent their country if Priti Patel’s insidious anti-immigration policies had been in operation a generation ago.
By virtue of their employment in the richest sporting theatre in the world, the value of English footballers has always been vastly over-inflated. Last month, Manchester United paid Borussia Dortmund £75 million for Jadon Sancho. Harry Maguire has never quite convinced that he merited the £80m Manchester United paid for him two years ago. Yet these players can’t be blamed for this.
READ MORE: BBC rejects claim that team covering Euro 2020 shows bias towards England
At least these players have earned their fortunes by maximising talent with actual hard work and dedication. The normal pattern for children from similar backgrounds travels in the opposite direction. Millions with gifts in other disciplines are denied the opportunity to contribute and to make something of themselves by a class system that always tilts the playing field in favour of birth and influence.
Earlier this week, the Sutton Trust highlighted how truly representative of the country the English national football team is. The trust, a charity that campaigns for increased social mobility, tweeted: “Compared to other sports, football is much more representative of the UK population, with only 8% of the England Euro 2020 squad having attended independent schools. For men’s rugby internationals, this figure is 37% and for cricket it’s even higher, at 43%.”
Yet many of these young men representing England at Euro 2020 have been intelligent and wise representatives of state schooling. Often, they’ve been more eloquent than the privileged products of the private school sector which dominate politics, the media, culture and sport across the UK. Only around 7% of the UK population attend fee-paying institutions. Yet the political influence and money this very small and privileged body of people come to possess is grossly disproportionate to their actual ability. If Britain truly was a nation based on fairness and equality, the top positions in society would follow a social pattern similar to that of the England national football team.
I sincerely hope Southgate and Rashford and Sterling and Kane do the business for England tonight and go on to become European champions on Sunday night. Post-Covid, this country is entering a long journey into its own heart of darkness, propelled there by a gangster government where the worst of England’s independent schools output have found favour.
Those who don’t have much now will have even less as they are made to bear the consequences of the pandemic. It may be that an England triumph at Euro 2020 will be their only light in the years ahead.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel