A SCOTTISH Green councillor has called on the Scottish Football Association to treat its men and women's team equally after the Welsh FA announced a new equal pay agreement.
It will mean a 25% pay cut for the men’s team to enable a rise of the same amount for the women’s side.
Scotland’s women’s national team announced in December they would be taking legal action against the SFA after talks broke down.
The players will demand a contract that stipulates equal pay and treatment compared to their male counterparts on issues such as training facilities, hotels, travel, kit and medical and nutritional resources.
READ MORE: Axing BBC bagpiping show would be ‘an own goal’, say pipers
Real Madrid’s Caroline Weir previously said that “payments from sponsorship deals overwhelmingly go to the men’s game, and to male players”.
She added: “In our current society, this is one example of the outdated prejudice towards one group of players.”
At the time, Scotland women’s Rachel Corsie said the move stemmed from a sense of “disrespect and lacking value”.
Discussions over agreeing a new pay deal to give equal pay to Wales’ women have been ongoing for over a year, with talks first taking place in November 2021.
Scottish Reaction
Glasgow City councillor Holly Bruce said she was “overjoyed” by the decision taken in Wales and called on the SFA to improve on levels of equality in the game.
She told The National: “It just made me a little bit more concerned that the same thing is not happening here in Scotland.
“I’m aware of the legal challenge being pursued after negotiations broke down so I’m a bit disheartened that couldn’t be resolved at the negotiation stage.
@ScottishFA take note. It’s about time women’s football was properly valued and respected in Scotland. https://t.co/5EbO2X1oek
— Cllr Holly Bruce (@cllrhollybruce) January 19, 2023
“Women’s football has grown and grown even in the last six months and the Scottish FA should take note.”
Scotland is behind on equality in football when compared to other associations around the world.
For example, the American women’s team reached a reported £17.7 million settlement with US Soccer last year after a six-year legal fight.
Equal pay arrangements are also in place in Norway and Canada while the Republic of Ireland also agreed to an equal match fee deal in August 2022.
“It’s unfortunate because Scotland has a terrible history with not involving women in football and we’re not progressing forward the way we should”, Bruce adds.
Women’s football was actually banned in 1921, while Bruce also cited the example of Rose Reilly, a trailblazer in the game.
Despite the game being banned for women in the 1970s, Reilly left her Ayrshire home at 17 and headed to Europe to fulfil her dream of becoming a professional footballer.
Elsewhere, the chief executive of one of Scotland’s top football clubs said that just as important as equal pay is equal opportunities and facilities.
'Equal everything' needed for high performance
Glasgow City’s Laura Montgomery said the Welsh announcement was great news but that there was still some way to go to achieve equality.
“It still highlights that women have never been paid the same across virtually every football association as more and more women’s national teams and players take action to change their situation.”
She continued: “Very rarely has an association itself made that change without a pursuit by the pioneering women who want to make things better for the generation that follows.”
Glasgow City has won the most Premier League titles and the most Scottish Cups in Scotland since 2000 and currently sit five points clear at the top of the Scottish Women’s Premier League.
She added: “As the Scottish national team legal action shows, equal pay is one thing but in terms of high performance it needs to be equal everything.
READ MORE: Bruce Fummey rejects invite to Burns Night with Rishi Sunak
“If our national associations believe in equality then they need to give both their male and female teams the best chance at access and that means the same performance environment.
“Whether that be travel, nutrition, equipment, staff provision and expertise, that fundamentally also has to be equal.”
A Scottish FA statement in respose stated: "In the interests of accuracy, it is important to clarify some facts arising from the latest statement issued by the SWNT.
"First, no national team player, whether men’s or women’s, is paid to play for their country or receive 'appearance fees'.
"International representation is and should always be regarded as a privilege and not a job, a view that we believed to be shared by all.
"We do not consider such fees to be in the spirit of playing for your country.
"Our Men’s and Women’s squads receive a per diem rate for their time with the national team, which has been exactly the same since 2017.
"While other associations such as those named in the SWNT statement may choose to pay appearance fees, our men’s and women’s national team players are incentivised to qualify for major tournaments, from which the teams are paid the same percentage of prize money from the tournament organiser.
"The squads are further remunerated in lieu of contractual media and/or promotional appearances for our national teams’ sponsors
"Again, the Scottish FA has ensured that men’s and women’s players are paid the same amount for appearances involving designated official national teams’ sponsors."
It added: “As a result of ongoing dialogue, in September the Scottish FA sent a draft agreement to the SWNT’s advisers, which confirmed that all financial arrangements for the SWNT and SMNT would be the same – in addition to the existing equal payments for promotional appearances – but have to date received no substantive response."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here