Andy Murray said his performance in losing to Alex de Minaur at the Monte-Carlo Masters on Monday was “one of the worst matches I’ve played in my career”.
The Scot, who began the year with a string of wins over top-ranked opponents, was well-prepared, having trained for 10 days on clay in Spain in the build-up and was hopeful of a good display on his first clay-court outing of the year.
But having lost his previous match in Miami in tame fashion, Murray was beaten 6-1, 6-3, leaving him disconsolate and at a loss to explain why.
“It was awful,” Murray told The Herald. “Nothing was good about it. I don't know exactly why that was. Obviously I didn't play a great match in Miami. And this was worse than that.
“I didn't do anything well, didn't serve well, return well, forehands, backhands, shot selection. It was one of the worst I've played in my career, probably.
“I had a match like that last year in Doha against (Roberto) Bautista (Agut) that was pretty bad and maybe one or two others in my career, but in terms of how I felt on the court, it was right up there, just across the board.”
Murray said he would now have to think about whether to play the rest of the clay-court season and said the defeat hurt more because he had trained hard and picked up some good wins.
“I was feeling optimistic coming into the clay,” he said. “I'd been feeling good with my body the last 10 days or so considering I've not played much on it.
“I was feeling good and I'd actually been moving pretty well in practice, so I was optimistic. But it was pretty demoralising and I've not felt like that many times in my career on the court. It was really tough.”
At The Herald and Times we know the importance of reaching you where it's convenient, which is why we've engaged top sportswriter James Morgan to bring you an irreverent daily update on what's happening in the world of sport. Be it football, golf, rugby, cricket or something more exotic, James will tread where the best stories take him. To get this bespoke piece sent directly to your email inbox for free every day at 5pm, simply take 5 seconds to type in your email here. It's that simple!
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here