Derek McInnes has given his verdict on Philippe Clement's decision to substitute Todd Cantwell after just 35 minutes last night, insisting it was a "surprise".
The Englishman was hooked and replaced by youngster Ross McCausland who ultimately grabbed the goal to ensure his side were not on the end of a shock defeat to Cypriot outfit Aris Limassol.
Cantwell was visibly frustrated as he took his seat in the home dugout and some supporters booed as the change was made.
McInnes was also shocked by the early switch and he was quizzed on whether he thinks there was more meaning behind the substitution, rather than just a tactical switch.
He told TNT Sports: "Possibly. You see the wee boy McCausland talking there saying that the manager asked him to give Rangers more width.
"Maybe that is a simple instruction that the manager was asking Cantwell to do. To hold his width more.
"Now Cantwell isn't an out-and-out outside right winger, but maybe he has been asked to play there a wee bit more effectively just to maybe try and create that space.
"You just don't know. If there is a frustration there then nobody really knows the ins and outs of what is being asked of the player.
"I think Cantwell gives Rangers something. Even when he is not at his best he is capable of producing big moments like against Prague.
"For me it was a surprise, I have to say that, but the manager paid to make these big decisions.
"McCausland comes on and he has the impact. The thing about him is that he always looks ready.
"In the few games that he has had he has influenced. He's been bright and confident when given the ball.
"He will be disappointed that he maybe didn't pull the trigger with his second chance, but he probably had more touches than any other Rangers player in the second half.
"That says a lot about him. He has met the responsibility that has been put on him so good on him for being ready."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel