Former referee Bobby Madden has delivered an insight into the VAR decision-making protocol behind Alistair Johnston's handball call during Celtic vs Rangers yesterday.
Ibrox boss Philippe Clement was insensed at full-time as he called into question the officiating after the Canadian full-back appeared to clearly handle the ball out of play with Abdallah Sima set to pounce in the box.
Referee Nick Walsh did not deem the incident a handball and VAR official Willie Collum decided not to intervene either despite reviewing the incident.
It was later revealed that Sima was offside in the build-up to the incident in question, and ex-SFA whistler Madden believes his former colleagues came to the right conclusion in the end.
On Instagram, Madden posted: "Another Old Firm game and another big call. With the usual misinformation and poor reporting.
"This in my opinion this is a clear punishable handball offence. Not easy for the referee to detect and VAR will, as ever, review all penalty area decisions.
"If the penalty was awarded on field it would have been disallowed when the VAR checked the APP (Attacking Phase Possession).
"As it wasn’t awarded VAR would have checked it. If VAR believed it was a penalty he would also check the APP and then identify the offside.
"To avoid any miscommunication the referee would be called for an on field review to decide if he thought penalty.
"If the referee thought it was a penalty they would show the offside and that’s how play would be restarted.
"If the referee didn’t think penalty then it would be started as when the game was stopped.
"This is a bit of a cumbersome process but it is designed to ensure people can understand the decision making process.
"So basically, VAR did not think that it was a penalty. Releasing an image of an offside however many minutes later was only to show that a penalty would have been a wrong decision and support the non intervention.
"In the end the correct decision was reached.
"Ps If there had been no offside in the APP, and the penalty was awarded, it is absolutely not a caution-able offence for handball for those also saying it would be a second yellow card."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel